ArticleScientific reports2019
Changes in Plant Rhizosphere Microbial Communities under Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns in Karst and Non-karst Ecosystems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Phosphorus Availability Through Bagasse Biochar Addition and Changes inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Host Species Mediate Distinct Seed Microbiome Responses to Restoration.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Eco-physiological adaptations, metabolomic profiles and genetic diversity across varied habitats in four medicinal plant species.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Effect of Vegetation Degradation on Soil Nitrogen Components and N-Cycling Enzyme Activities in a Wet Meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Planted Citrus Regulates the Community and Networks ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Diversity and Functional Roles of Root-Associated Endophytic Fungi in Two Dominant Pioneer Trees Reclaimed from a Metal Mine Slag Heap in Southwest China.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Soil Fungal Community Differences in Manual Plantation Larch Forest and Natural Larch Forest in Northeast China.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Effects of rocky desertification on soil bacterial community in alpine grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effects of intercropping teak withFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effects of Vegetation Restoration on Soil Nitrogen Fractions and Enzyme Activities in Arable Land on Purple Soil Slopes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Soil structure influences proteins, phenols, and flavonoids of varied medicinal plants in Al Jubail, KSA.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2023Article
- Effects of different grassland use patterns on soil bacterial communities in the karst desertification areas.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Archaea and their interactions with bacteria in a karst ecosystem.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Landscape Composition and Soil Physical-Chemical Properties Drive the Assemblages of Bacteria and Fungi in Conventional Vegetable Fields.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Effect of Cultivated Pastures on Soil Bacterial Communities in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- A Comparative Analysis on the Structure and Function of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in fragile karst ecosystems of southwest China.PeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how patterns of recovery and geological conditions affect microbial communities is important for determining the stability of karst ecosystems. Here, we investigated the diversity and composition of microorganisms in karst and non-karst environments under natural restoration and artificial rehabilitation conditions. The results showed no significant differences in soil microbial diversity, but the microbial communities associated with geological conditions and tree species differed significantly. Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) showed that a total of 77.3% of the variation in bacteria and a total of 69.3% of the variation in fungi could be explained by vegetation type and geological background. There were significant differences in six bacterial classes (Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Ktedonobacteria, TK10, Gammaproteobacteria, and Anaerolineae) and nine fungal classes (Eurotiomycetes, Agaricomycetes, unclassified _p_Ascomycota, Sordariomycetes, Tremellomycetes, norank_k_Fungi, Pezizomycetes, Leotiomycetes and Archaeorhizomycetes) among the soils collected from six plots. A Spearman correlation heatmap showed that the microbial community was affected by the major soil properties. Principal coordinates analysis indicated that the microbial community of Pinus yunnanensis in the artificial forest, which was established for the protection of the environment was most similar to that in the natural secondary forest in the karst ecosystem. These findings further our understanding of microbial responses to vegetation restoration and geological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.