Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217343›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2019

One-Day Versus Three-Day Dexamethasone in Combination with Palonosetron for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data-Based Meta-Analysis.

Yuki Okada, Koji Oba, Naoto Furukawa, Yoshimasa Kosaka, Kenji Okita, Satoshi Yuki, Yoshito Komatsu, Luigi Celio, Matti Aapro

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. 2023 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of nausea and vomiting following high-emetic-risk antineoplastic agents.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. 2023 updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus recommendations: Prevention of nausea and vomiting following moderately emetic risk antineoplastic agents.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. 5HTCancer science · 2021
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy of steroid-omitting antiemetic therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving nano-liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. 2023 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: controlling nausea and vomiting with chemotherapy of low or minimal emetic potential.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuki OkadaDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan.
Koji ObaDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan oba@epistat.m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5468-8988
Naoto FurukawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Suita Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshimasa KosakaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kenji OkitaDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Satoshi YukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshito KomatsuDepartment of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Luigi CelioDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Matti AaproCancer Center, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland.
Hokkaido University Hospital · JPClinique de Genolier · CHFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITKitasato University · JPOsaka City University · JPSapporo Medical University · JPSuita Municipal Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA dexamethasone-sparing regimen consisting of palonosetron plus 1-day dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) has been studied previously. Here, we evaluate the noninferiority of the dexamethasone-sparing regimen in overall antiemetic control using a meta-analysis based on individual patient data (IPD). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a systematic review for randomized trials reporting CINV outcomes for the comparison of palonosetron plus 1-day dexamethasone (d1 arm) versus the same regimen followed by dexamethasone on days 2-3 after chemotherapy (d3 arm) in chemotherapy-naïve adult patients undergoing either moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC)-containing chemotherapy. PubMed and MEDLINE were searched electronically. A manual search was also conducted. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis and no rescue medication) in the overall 5-day study period. The noninferiority margin was set at -8.0% (d1 arm-d3 arm).

resultsFive studies (

conclusionThis IPD meta-analysis indicates that the dexamethasone-sparing regimen is not associated with a significant loss in overall antiemetic control in patients undergoing MEC or AC-containing chemotherapy, irrespective of known risk factors for CINV. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although dexamethasone in combination with other antiemetic agents has been used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), it is of clinical importance to minimize total dose of dexamethasone in patients undergoing multiple cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy. This individual-patient-data meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trials (1,194 patients) demonstrated a noninferiority of the dexamethasone-sparing regimen for complete response and complete control of CINV. The outcomes were comparable across patients with different characteristics. These findings thus help physicians minimize use of the steroid and further reduce the burden of dexamethasone-related side effects in patients undergoing multiple consecutive courses of emetogenic chemotherapy.

Indexed as

DexamethasoneDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaPalonosetronVomitingDexamethasonePalonosetronChemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomitingDexamethasoneModerately emetogenic chemotherapyNauseaPalonosetronVomiting

Identifiers

PMID31217343
PMCPMC6975929
OpenAlexW2949903957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.