Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31217005›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2019

Efficacy of diode and CO

Elham Soltanimehr, Ehsan Bahrampour, Zeynab Yousefvand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elham SoltanimehrDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Ehsan BahrampourDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Building No. 1, Shahid Beheshti Boulevard, Kermanshah, 6715847141, Iran. e.bahrampour@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-5770
Zeynab YousefvandSchool of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 980-nm diode and 10.6-μm CO

methodsIn total, 117 extracted primary anterior teeth were randomly divided into eight experimental and one control group: (I) control (polished enamel), (II) fTCP varnish, (III) fTCP + diode laser, (IV) fTCP + CO

resultsSignificant differences existed in microhardness (P = 0.004) and percentage of remineralization (P < 0.001) after remineralization among the material groups such that the highest mean was noted in the CPP-ACP group. No significant difference was noted in microhardness (P = 0.052) or percentage of remineralization (P = 0.981) after remineralization among the laser groups. In all groups, porosities increased after demineralization and slightly decreased after remineralization; the greatest reduction in porosity of the material groups was noted in the fTCP group, and the CO

conclusionThe highest microhardness was achieved after remineralization with CPP-ACP. The efficacy of the diode and CO

trial registrationThis is not a human subject research.

Indexed as

Lasers, GasLasers, SemiconductorCariostatic AgentsCaseinsChildChild, PreschoolDental EnamelFemaleFluoridesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaleSurface PropertiesTooth, DeciduousTooth RemineralizationCariostatic Agentscasein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexCaseinsFluoridesCasein Phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphateCO2 laserDiode laserMicrohardnessPorosityRemineralizationTricalcium phosphate fluoride

Identifiers

PMID31217005
PMCPMC6585004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.