Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31216731›Full record

ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Current Trends and Opportunities for Competency Assessment in Pharmacy Education-A Literature Review.

Hayley Croft, Conor Gilligan, Rohan Rasiah, Tracy Levett-Jones, Jennifer Schneider

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Establishing competency based internship program through participatory action research in a private pharmacy college in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Pharmacy Game-GIMMICSPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hayley CroftSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Hayley.croft@newcastle.edu.au.
Conor GilliganSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Conor.gilligan@newcastle.edu.au.
Rohan RasiahWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, University of Western Australia, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia. Rohan.rasiah@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-822X
Tracy Levett-JonesFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia. Tracy.Levett-Jones@uts.edu.au.
Jennifer SchneiderSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Jennifer.Schneider@newcastle.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing emphasis on health professional competency in recent times has been matched by an increased prevalence of competency-based education models. Assessments can generate information on competence, and authentic, practice-based assessment methods are critical. Assessment reform has emerged as an academic response to the demands of the pharmacy profession and the need to equip graduates with the necessary knowledge, skills and attributes to face the challenges of the modern workforce. The objective of this review was to identify and appraise the range of assessment methods used in entry-level pharmacy education and examine current trends in health professional assessment. The initial search located 2854 articles. After screening, 36 sources were included in the review, 13 primary research studies, 12 non-experimental pharmacy research papers, and 11 standards and guidelines from the grey literature. Primary research studies were critically appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). This review identified three areas in pharmacy practice assessment which provide opportunities for expansion and improvement of assessment approaches: (1) integrated approaches to performance assessment; (2) simulation-based assessment approaches, and; (3) collection of validity evidence to support assessment decisions. Competency-based assessment shows great potential for expanded use in pharmacy, but there is a need for further research and development to ensure its appropriate and effective use.

Indexed as

assessmentcompetency-based educationEntrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)health professionalsObjective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)pharmacistpharmacypharmacy studentsimulation

Identifiers

PMID31216731
PMCPMC6630227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.