Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31216708›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Effects of Enrichment Type, Presentation and Social Status on Enrichment Use and Behaviour of Sows with Electronic Sow Feeding.

Cyril Roy, Lindsey Lippens, Victoria Kyeiwaa, Yolande M Seddon, Laurie M Connor, Jennifer A Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cyril RoyPrairie Swine Centre, Box 21057, 2105-8th Street East, Saskatoon, SK S7H 5N9, Canada. Cyril.Roy@usask.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1973-8630
Lindsey LippensDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 201-12 Dafoe Road, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada. Lindsey_2310@hotmail.com.
Victoria KyeiwaaPrairie Swine Centre, Box 21057, 2105-8th Street East, Saskatoon, SK S7H 5N9, Canada. Victoria.Kyeiwaa@usask.ca.
Yolande M SeddonWestern College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B4, Canada. yolande.seddon@usask.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-3570
Laurie M ConnorDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 201-12 Dafoe Road, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada. Laurie.Connor@umanitoba.ca.
Jennifer A BrownPrairie Swine Centre, Box 21057, 2105-8th Street East, Saskatoon, SK S7H 5N9, Canada. jennifer.brown@usask.ca.

Funding

Swine Innovation Porc 1231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify practical enrichments for sows in partially or fully slatted pen systems. Four treatments were applied: (1) Constant: constant provision of wood on chain; (2) Rotate: rotation of rope, straw and wood enrichments; (3) Stimulus: rotation of enrichments (as in Rotate) with an associative stimulus (bell or whistle); and (4) Control: no enrichment, with each treatment lasting 12 days. Six groups of 20 ± 2 sows were studied from weeks 6 to 14 of gestation in pens with one electronic sow feeder. Each group received all treatments in random order. Six focal animals (3 dominant and 3 subordinate) were selected per pen using a feed competition test. Digital photos were collected at 10 min intervals for 8 h (between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.) on 4 days/treatment (d 1, 8, 10 and 12) to record interactions with enrichment. Skin lesions were assessed on days 1 and 12, and saliva cortisol samples collected in weeks 6, 10 and 14 of gestation on focal pigs. Sows spent more time in contact with enrichments in Rotate and Stimulus treatments than Constant. Enrichment treatments did not influence lesion scores. Subordinate sows spent more time standing and near enrichments than dominants. Subordinate sows also received more skin lesions and had higher salivary cortisol concentrations than dominants. These results indicate that access to enrichment is valued by sows but can result in greater aggression directed towards subordinates.

Indexed as

aggressionenvironmental enrichmenthabituationsocial statussows

Identifiers

PMID31216708
PMCPMC6616966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.