Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31216693›Full record

ArticleViruses2019

Michael M Lutz, Megan P Worth, Meleana M Hinchman, John S L Parker, Emily D Ledgerwood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael M LutzDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, NY 13214 USA. Michael_Lutz@urmc.rochester.edu.
Megan P WorthDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, NY 13214 USA. worthmp@lemoyne.edu.
Meleana M HinchmanJ.A. Baker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. mmh46@cornell.edu.
John S L ParkerJ.A. Baker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. jsp7@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4487-4175
Emily D LedgerwoodDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Le Moyne College, Syracuse, NY 13214 USA. ledgered@lemoyne.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4438-7764
Le Moyne College · USCornell University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of virus-mediated compartmentalization of the host translational machineryR01AI121216 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI PARKER, JOHN S · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121216NIH HHS R01AI121216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following reovirus infection, cells activate stress responses that repress canonical translation as a mechanism to limit progeny virion production. Work by others suggests that these stress responses, which are part of the integrated stress response (ISR), may benefit rather than repress reovirus replication. Here, we report that compared to untreated cells, treating cells with sodium arsenite (SA) to activate the ISR prior to infection enhanced viral protein expression, percent infectivity, and viral titer. SA-mediated enhancement was not strain-specific, but was cell-type specific. While SA pre-treatment of cells offered the greatest enhancement, treatment within the first 4 h of infection increased the percent of cells infected. SA activates the heme-regulated eIF2α (HRI) kinase, which phosphorylates eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α) to induce stress granule (SG) formation. Heat shock (HS), another activator of HRI, also induced eIF2α phosphorylation and SGs in cells. However, HS had no effect on percent infectivity or viral yield but did enhance viral protein expression. These data suggest that SA pre-treatment perturbs the cell in a way that is beneficial for reovirus and that this enhancement is independent of SG induction. Understanding how to manipulate the cellular stress responses during infection to enhance replication could help to maximize the oncolytic potential of reovirus.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationArsenitesCell LineEnzyme InhibitorsHumansOrthoreovirus, MammalianSodium CompoundsStress, PhysiologicalViral LoadArsenitesEnzyme Inhibitorssodium arseniteSodium Compoundsheat shockHRI kinaseintegrated stress responsephosphorylated eIF2αreovirussalubrinalsodium arsenitestress granulestranslationviral factory

Identifiers

PMID31216693
PMCPMC6631071
OpenAlexW2949916533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.