Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31216333›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Performance of careHPV, hybrid capture 2 and visual inspection with acetic acid for detection of high-grade cervical lesion in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study.

Johnson Katanga, Susanne K Kjaer, Rachel Manongi, Chun Sen Wu, Thomas Iftner, Marianne Waldstrom, Andrea B Pembe, Julius Mwaiselage, Vibeke Rasch

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative analysis of SD biosensor standardBMC infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Developing Research Education Groups in African Cancer Centers: The Experience in Tanzania.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Johnson KatangaOcean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-1021-2280
Susanne K KjaerDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rachel ManongiInstitute of Public Health, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania.
Chun Sen WuDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Thomas IftnerDepartment of Virologi, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany.
Marianne WaldstromDepartment of Pathology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Andrea B PembeMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Julius MwaiselageOcean Road Cancer Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Vibeke RaschDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZOcean Road Cancer Institute · TZUniversity of Copenhagen · DKVejle Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the test performance of careHPV, Hybrid Capture2 (HC2) and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for detection of cytologically diagnosed high-grade cervical lesions or cancer (HSIL+).

designCross-sectional study.

settingOcean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) and Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center (KCMC), Tanzania. POPULATION: Women attending routine cervical cancer screening.

methodWe enrolled 4080 women (25-60 years) in the study. The women were interviewed on lifestyle habits, and tested for HIV. A cervical specimen for careHPV testing (performed at ORCI and KCMC), and a liquid-based cytology sample for HPV DNA detection using HC2 (performed at Tuebingen University Hospital, Germany) and for cytology assessment (performed at Vejle Hospital, Denmark) were obtained at a gynecological examination. Subsequently, VIA was performed. With cytology as gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of careHPV, HC2, and VIA for detection of HSIL+ were calculated.

resultsAltogether, 23.6% had a positive careHPV test, 19.1% had positive HC2 test, and 6.3% had a positive VIA test. The sensitivity/specificity was 88.9%/78.9% for careHPV and 91.1%/83.7%, for HC2. VIA showed a low sensitivity of 31.1% but a high specificity (94.6%) for detection of HSIL+. The sensitivity of careHPV, HC2 and VIA was higher among younger women, and among HIV positive women. VIA triage of careHPV positive women improved specificity, but sensitivity dropped to 27%.

conclusionOur results confirm the low sensitivity of VIA for detection of HSIL+ and further document that careHPV test is promising as a primary screening method for cervical-cancer prevention in low-resource regions. A suitable triage test has to be identified.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHuman Papillomavirus DNA TestsHumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificitySquamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the CervixTanzania

Identifiers

PMID31216333
PMCPMC6583973
OpenAlexW2949656398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.