Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31216329›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Discordance of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation between primary lung tumor and paired distant metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chia Ching Lee, Yu Yang Soon, Char Loo Tan, Wee Yao Koh, Cheng Nang Leong, Jeremy Chee Seong Tey, Ivan Weng Keong Tham

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiomic Signatures for PredictingFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chia Ching LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6925-8603
Yu Yang SoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Char Loo TanDepartment of Pathology, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Wee Yao KohDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Cheng Nang LeongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Jeremy Chee Seong TeyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ivan Weng Keong ThamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute Singapore, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
National University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGNational University Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the rate of discordance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation between primary lung tumor and paired distant metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of 17 studies (518 cases) assessing discordance rates of EGFR mutation in primary tumors and paired distant metastases. We performed subgroup analyses based on EGFR mutation status in primary tumor (mutant or wildtype), site of distant metastasis (bone, central nervous system (CNS) or lung/ pleural), methods of testing (direct sequencing or allele-specific testing) and timing of metastasis (synchronous or metachronous).

resultsThe overall discordance rate in EGFR mutation was low at 10.36% (95% CI = 4.23% to 18.79%) and varied widely between studies (I2 = 83.18%). The EGFR discordance rate was statistically significantly higher in bone metastases (45.49%, 95% CI = 14.13 to 79.02) than CNS (17.26%, 95% CI = 7.64 to 29.74; P = 0.002) and lung/ pleural metastases (8.17%, 95% CI = 3.35 to 14.85; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate any significant effect modification on the discordance rates by the EGFR mutation status in primary lung tumor, methods of testing and timing of metastasis.

conclusionThe overall discordance rate in EGFR mutation between primary lung tumor and paired distant metastases in NSCLC is low, although higher discordance rates were observed in bone metastases compared with CNS and lung/pleural metastases. Future studies assessing the impact of EGFR mutation discordance on treatment outcomes are required.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansMutationNeoplasm MetastasisEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID31216329
PMCPMC6583965
OpenAlexW2949476238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.