Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31216310›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Machine learning approach yields epigenetic biomarkers of food allergy: A novel 13-gene signature to diagnose clinical reactivity.

Ayush Alag

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Prediction of pediatric peanut oral food challenge outcomes using machine learning.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The future of food allergy diagnosis.Frontiers in allergy · 2024
    Review
  9. Promises and challenges in pharmacoepigenetics.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Machine Learning in Epigenomics: Insights into Cancer Biology and Medicine.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Genetics of Food Allergy.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ayush AlagThe Harker School, San Jose, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8948-2493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent laboratory tests are less than 50% accurate in distinguishing between people who have food allergies (FA) and those who are merely sensitized to foods, resulting in the use of expensive and potentially dangerous Oral Food Challenges. This study presents a purely-computational machine learning approach, conducted using DNA Methylation (DNAm) data, to accurately diagnose food allergies and potentially find epigenetic targets for the disease. METHODS AND

resultsAn unbiased feature-selection pipeline was created that narrowed down 405,000+ potential CpG biomarkers to 18. Machine-learning models that utilized subsets of this 18-feature aggregate achieved perfect classification accuracy on completely hidden test cohorts (on an 8-fold hidden dataset). Ensemble classification was also shown to be effective for this High Dimension Low Sample Size (HDLSS) DNA methylation dataset. The efficacy of these machine learning classifiers and the 18 CpGs was further validated by their high accuracy on a large number of hidden data permutations, where the samples in the training, cross-validation, and hidden sets were repeatedly randomly allocated. The 18-CpG signature mapped to 13 genes, on which biological insights were collected. Notably, many of the FA-discriminating genes found in this study were strongly associated with the immune system, and seven of the 13 genes were previously associated with FA.

conclusionsPrevious studies have also created highly-accurate classifiers for this dataset, using both data-driven and a priori biological insights to construct a 96-CpG signature. This research builds on previous work because it uses a completely computational approach to obtain a perfect classification accuracy while using only 18 highly discriminating CpGs (0.005% of the total available features). In machine learning, simpler models, as used in this study, are generally preferred over more complex ones (other things being equal). Lastly, the completely data-driven methodology presented in this research eliminates the need for a priori biological information and allows for generalizability to other DNAm classification problems.

Indexed as

ArachisBiomarkersDNA MethylationEgg HypersensitivityEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFood HypersensitivityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMaleBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31216310
PMCPMC6584060
OpenAlexW2951589587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.