Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215721›Full record

Trial reportAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2019

A Multifaceted Intervention Improves Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infection for Adults and Children in Emergency Department and Urgent Care Settings.

Kabir Yadav, Daniella Meeker, Rakesh D Mistry, Jason N Doctor, Katherine E Fleming-Dutra, Ross J Fleischman, Samuel D Gaona, Aubyn Stahmer, Larissa May

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in emergency departments: how do we measure antimicrobial use? A systematic review.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Cluster-Randomized Trials in Emergency Care Research.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Integrating an antimicrobial stewardship bundle into advanced urgent care sites.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotic Stewardship: A Decade of Progress.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kabir YadavDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1092-9935
Daniella MeekerSchaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Rakesh D MistryDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Jason N DoctorSchaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Katherine E Fleming-DutraDivision of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Ross J FleischmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA.
Samuel D GaonaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Aubyn StahmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Larissa MayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Southern California · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USThe Lundquist Institute · USUCLA Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED)R21AG057400 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MEEKER, DANIELLA · 2017 to 2018
$461k
CDC HHS 200-2016-91939NIA NIH HHS R21 AG057400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotics are commonly prescribed during emergency department (ED) and urgent care center (UCC) visits for viral acute respiratory infection (ARI). We evaluate the comparative effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention adapted for acute care ambulatory settings (adapted intervention) to a stewardship intervention that additionally incorporates behavioral nudges (enhanced intervention) in reducing inappropriate prescriptions.

methodsThis study was a pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial conducted in three academic health systems comprising five adult and pediatric EDs and four UCCs. Randomization of the nine sites was stratified by health system; all providers at each site received either the adapted or the enhanced intervention. The main outcome was the proportion of antibiotic-inappropriate ARI diagnosis visits that received an outpatient antibiotic prescription by individual providers. We estimated a hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression model comparing visits during the influenza season for 2016 to 2017 (baseline) and 2017 to 2018 (intervention).

resultsThere were 44,820 ARI visits among 292 providers across all nine cluster sites. Antibiotic prescribing for ARI visits dropped from 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5% to 7.9%) to 2.4% (95% CI = 1.3% to 3.4%) during the study period. We found a significant reduction in inappropriate prescribing after adjusting for health-system and provider-level effects from 2.2% (95% CI = 1.0% to 3.4%) to 1.5% (95% CI = 0.7% to 2.3%) with an odds ratio of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.54 to 0.82). Difference-in-differences between the two interventions was not significantly different.

conclusionImplementation of antibiotic stewardship for ARI is feasible and effective in the ED and UCC settings. More intensive behavioral nudging methods were not more effective in high-performance settings.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipAdultAmbulatory CareAnti-Bacterial AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelChildEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingLogistic ModelsMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Program EvaluationRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31215721
PMCPMC8146207
OpenAlexW2951499921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.