ArticleMedical physics2019
Feasibility of multi-contrast imaging on dual-source photon counting detector (PCD) CT: An initial phantom study.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photon-counting computed tomography enables low-dose, high-quality abdominal imaging: A comparative study with energy-integrating detector computed tomography.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Technical performance of dual-contrast-agent K-edge imaging with four energy thresholds on a commercial photon counting detector CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Photon-counting detector CT: a disrupting innovation in medical imaging.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Photon-counting in dual-contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a proof-of-concept quantitative biomechanical assessment of articular cartilage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spectral optimization using fast kV switching and filtration for photon counting CT with realistic detector responses: a simulation study.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Iterative clustering material decomposition aided by empirical spectral correction for photon counting detectors in micro-CT.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Visual and Quantitative Evaluation of Low-Concentration Bismuth in Dual-Contrast Imaging of Iodine and Bismuth Using Clinical Photon-Counting CT.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Photon-Counting Computed Tomography in Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Innovative advances in pediatric radiology: computed tomography reconstruction techniques, photon-counting detector computed tomography, and beyond.Pediatric radiology · 2024Review
- Advantages of Photon-Counting Detector CT in Aortic Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- [Current CT developments in imaging of pancreatic diseases].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- CT-based methods for assessment of metabolic dysfunction associated with fatty liver disease.European radiology experimental · 2023Review
- Clinical applications of photon counting detector CT.European radiology · 2023Review
- Dual-Source Photon-Counting Computed Tomography-Part I: Clinical Overview of Cardiac CT and Coronary CT Angiography Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low-dose quantitative spectral imaging.European radiology · 2022Article
- Photon-Counting Detector CT: Key Points Radiologists Should Know.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Model-based three-material decomposition in dual-energy CT using the volume conservation constraint.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Simultaneous dual-contrast imaging using energy-integrating detector multi-energy CT: An in vivo feasibility study.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Dual-Contrast Biphasic Liver Imaging With Iodine and Gadolinium Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography: An Exploratory Animal Study.Investigative radiology · 2022Article
- Spectral CT using a fine grid structure and varying x-ray incidence angle.Medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePhoton-counting-detector-computed tomography (PCD-CT) allows separation of multiple, simultaneously imaged contrast agents, such as iodine (I), gadolinium (Gd), and bismuth (Bi). However, PCDs suffer from several technical limitations such as charge sharing, K-edge escape, and pulse pile-up, which compromise spectral separation of multi-energy data and degrade multi-contrast imaging performance. The purpose of this work was to determine the performance of a dual-source (DS) PCD-CT relative to a single-source (SS) PCD-CT for the separation of simultaneously imaged I, Gd, and Bi contrast agents.
methodsPhantom experiments were performed using a research whole-body PCD-CT and head/abdomen-sized phantoms containing vials of different I, Gd, Bi concentrations. To emulate a DS-PCD-CT, the phantoms were scanned twice on the SS-PCD-CT using different tube potentials for each scan. A tube potential of 80 kV (energy thresholds = 25/50 keV) was used for low-energy tube, while the high-energy tube used Sn140 kV (Sn indicates tin filter) and thresholds of 25/90 keV. The same phantoms were scanned also on the SS-PCD-CT using the chess acquisition mode. In chess mode, the 4 × 4 subpixels within a macro detector pixel are split into two sets based on a chess-board pattern. With each subpixel set having two energy thresholds, chess mode allows four energy-bin data sets, which permits simultaneous multi-contrast imaging. Because of this design, only 50% area of each detector pixel is configured to receive photons of a pre-defined threshold, leading to 50% dose utilization efficiency. To compensate for this dose inefficiency, the radiation dose for this scan was doubled compared to DS-PCD-CT. A 140 kV tube potential and thresholds = 25/50/75/90 keV were used. These settings were determined based on the K-edges of Gd, and Bi, and were found to yield good differentiation of I/Gd/Bi based on phantom experiments and other literature. The energy-bin images obtained from each scan (scan pair) were used to generate I-, Gd-, Bi-specific image via material decomposition. Root-mean-square-error (RMSE) between the known and measured concentrations was calculated for each scenario. A 20-cm water cylinder phantom was scanned on both systems, which was used for evaluating the magnitude of noise, and noise power spectra (NPS) of I/Gd/Bi-specific images.
resultsPhantom results showed that DS-PCD-CT reduced noise in material-specific images for both head and body phantoms compared to SS-PCD-CT. The noise level of SS-PCD was reduced from 2.55 to 0.90 mg/mL (I), 1.97 to 0.78 mg/mL (Gd), and 0.85 to 0.74 mg/mL (Bi) using DS-PCD. NPS analysis showed that the noise texture of images acquired on both systems is similar. For the body phantom, the RMSE for SS-PCD-CT was reduced relative to DS-PCD-CT from 10.52 to 2.76 mg/mL (I), 7.90 to 2.01 mg/mL (Gd), and 1.91 to 1.16 mg/mL (Bi). A similar trend was observed for the head phantom: RMSE reduced from 2.59 (SS-PCD) to 0.72 (DS-PCD) mg/mL (I), 2.02 to 0.58 mg/mL (Gd), and 0.85 to 0.57 mg/mL (Bi).
conclusionWe demonstrate the feasibility of performing simultaneous imaging of I, Gd, and Bi materials on DS-PCD-CT. Under the condition without cross scattering, DS-PCD reduced the RMSE for quantification of material concentration in relative to a SS-PCD-CT system using chess mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.