Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215651›Full record

ArticleJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2019

Antecedents of attachment states of mind in normative-risk and high-risk caregiving: cross-race and cross-sex generalizability in two longitudinal studies.

John D Haltigan, Glenn I Roisman, Ashley M Groh, Ashley S Holland, Cathryn Booth-LaForce, Fred A Rogosch, Dante Cicchetti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

John D HaltiganDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Glenn I RoismanInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ashley M GrohDepartment of Psychology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ashley S HollandDepartment of Psychology, Edgewood College, Madison, WI, USA.
Cathryn Booth-LaForceSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Fred A RogoschMt. Hope Family Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Dante CicchettiInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Rochester · USEdgewood College · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

TEEN DRUG USE/ABUSE: PATHWAYS FROM CHILD MALTREATMENTR01DA012903 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CICCHETTI, DANTE · 2000 to 2004
$2.2M
Stability and Change in Attachment and Social Functioning, Infancy to AdolescenceR01HD054822 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOOTH-LAFORCE, CATHRYN · 2007 to 2011
$2.2M
Antecedents of Secure Base Script Knowledge, Infancy to AdolescenceR01HD069442 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BOST, KELLY KORINNE, ROISMAN, GLENN I · 2011 to 2012
$478k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054822NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069442NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLongitudinal investigations of relatively large typical-risk (e.g., Booth-LaForce & Roisman, 2014) and higher-risk samples (e.g., Raby et al., 2017; Roisman et al., 2017) have produced evidence consistent with the claim that attachment states of mind in adolescence and young adulthood, as measured by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), are associated with the quality of caregiving experienced during childhood. None of these studies, however, has examined whether such associations are consistent across sex and/or race, as would be expected in light of the sensitivity hypothesis of attachment theory.

methodsWe examine whether sex or race moderates previously reported links between caregiving and AAI states of mind in two longitudinal studies (pooled N = 1,058) in which caregiving was measured either within (i.e., observed [in]sensitive care) or outside (i.e., childhood maltreatment) of the normative range of caregiving experiences.

resultsHierarchical moderated regression analyses in both longitudinal cohorts provided evidence that maternal insensitivity and experiences of maltreatment were prospectively associated with dismissing and preoccupied states of mind in adolescence, as hypothesized. Moreover, these associations were generally comparable in magnitude for African American and White/non-Hispanic participants and were not conditional on participants' biological sex.

conclusionsBoth maternal insensitivity and the experience of maltreatment increased risk for insecure attachment states of mind in adolescence. Moreover, our analyses provided little evidence that either participant race or participant sex assigned at birth moderated these nontrivial associations between measures of the quality of experienced caregiving and insecure attachment states of mind in adolescence. These findings provide support for the sensitivity hypothesis of attachment theory and inform the cultural universality hypothesis of attachment processes.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentSex FactorsAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanChildChild AbuseChild RearingFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMaternal BehaviorMother-Child RelationsWhite PeopleYoung AdultAdult Attachment Interviewattachmentattachment states of mindcultural differencesmaltreatmentsensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31215651
PMCPMC6856397
OpenAlexW2950269693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.