Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215598›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2019

3D comparison of dental arch stability in patients with and without cleft lip and palate after orthodontic/rehabilitative treatment.

Jorge Tomasio Caballero, Maria Giulia Rezende Pucciarelli, Victor Fabrizio Cabrera Pazmiño, Victor Prado Curvêllo, Márcio de Menezes, Chiarella Sforza, Simone Soares

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dental hypersensitivity in individuals with cleft lip and palate: Origin and therapies.Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge Tomasio CaballeroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0020-2927
Maria Giulia Rezende PucciarelliUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-5570
Victor Fabrizio Cabrera PazmiñoUniversidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8432-2319
Victor Prado CurvêlloUniversidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6840-7577
Márcio de MenezesUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas, Amazonas, Manaus, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-9474
Chiarella SforzaUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Functional Anatomy Research Center (FARC), Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6532-6464
Simone SoaresUniversidade de São Paulo, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia, Bauru, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-7302
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas · BRUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the linear dimensions of the dental arches of adult patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) after orthodontic and prosthetic treatment with fixed partial dentures (FPD) to patients without clefts, using 3D technology. This retrospective longitudinal study sample consisted of 35 subjects divided into two groups. Included in this sample were 15 complete UCLP individuals who had received orthodontic treatment before rehabilitation with a fixed partial denture (FG), as well as 20 patients without cleft as control group (CG). All patients were aged between 18 and 30 years. Digital dental casts were obtained in two stages: (T1) end of orthodontic treatment and (T2) one year after prosthetic rehabilitation (FG); and (T1) end of orthodontic treatment and (T2) one year after removal of the orthodontic appliance (CG). Intercanine, interfirst premolar and intermolar distances, and incisor-molar length were obtained. A precalibrated and trained examiner performed the assessments. Intergroup differences between T2 and T1 were compared between the groups using the t test or Mann-Whitney test with a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). The intercanine distance variation (T2-T1) showed statistical difference (p=0.005) increasing in the FG group and decreasing in the CG group. In the interfirst premolar distance variation, FG decreased, while CG increased with statistically significant difference (p=0.008). The intercanine distance of individuals with cleft showed stability, while that of the CG had no stability. The CG showed stability in the interfirst premolar distance, while FG had no stability. These findings showed that the FPD is capable of restricting orthodontic results, leading to a stabilization of the dental arches.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnatomic LandmarksCleft LipCleft PalateDental ArchDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMaxillaOrthodontic AppliancesOrthodontics, CorrectiveReference ValuesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31215598
PMCPMC6559757
OpenAlexW2950896516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.