Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215454›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Unethical behavior and professionalism among medical students in a private medical university in Malaysia.

Hematram Yadav, Ravindran Jegasothy, Sowmya Ramakrishnappa, Jaiprakash Mohanraj, Prathapa Senan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Professionalism Dilemma and Moral Distress through Medical Students' Eyes: A Mixed-Method Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exploring medical ethics' implementation challenges: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hematram YadavDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, MAHSA University, Selangor, Malaysia. dryadav@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5242-4700
Ravindran JegasothyFaculty of Medicine, MAHSA University, Selangor, Malaysia.
Sowmya RamakrishnappaDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, MAHSA University, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jaiprakash MohanrajDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, MAHSA University, Selangor, Malaysia.
Prathapa SenanDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, MAHSA University, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mahsa University · MY

Funding

Mahsa University RP95-9/16 dated 3/11/2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthical behavior and professionalism is an ideal characteristic required of medical students and included as 'must achieve' and critical aspect of medical students' curriculum. This study proposes to determine the perceived unethical and unprofessional behavior among medical students in a private medical university from year 1 to year 5 of the medical curriculum.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among year 1 to year 5 medical students in a private medical university. A self-administered questionnaire was used with the 3 major domains of professionalism and ethics i.e. discipline plagiarism and cheating.

resultsA total of 464 respondents responded to the survey and they included medical students from year 1 and year 2 (pre-clinical) and years 3-5 (clinical years). Majority of the students, 275 (59.2%) answered that they had not seen any form of unethical behavior among other students. The females seem to have a larger number 172(63%) among the same gender compared to the males. Majority 352 (75%) of them had not heard of the 'Code of Professional Conduct by the Malaysian Medical Council'. About fifty three (53.1%) of the students answered that the training was sufficient.

conclusionsThis study showed that the perception of unethical behavior was 58.8% in the 1st year (pre-clinical) and it increased to 65.2% in the 5th year (clinical). The 3 main discipline issues were students do not show interest in class (mean 2.9/4), they are rude to other students (mean 2.8/4) and talking during class (mean 2.6/4). Despite the existence of unethical behavior among the students majority of them (71.7%) claimed that they had adequate training in ethics and professionalism. It is proposed that not only the teaching of ethics and professionalism be reviewed but an assessment strategy be introduced to strengthen the importance of professionalism and ethics.

Indexed as

UniversitiesCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleMoralsPlagiarismProfessional CompetenceProfessionalismProfessional MisconductStudents, MedicalYoung AdultDisciplineEthicsMedical students. Medical educationPlagiarism and cheatingProfessionalismSexual harassment

Identifiers

PMID31215454
PMCPMC6582586
OpenAlexW2951190110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.