Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215427›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

Ear biometrics for patient identification in global health: a field study to test the effectiveness of an image stabilization device in improving identification accuracy.

Lauren P Etter, Elizabeth J Ragan, Rachael Campion, David Martinez, Christopher J Gill

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren P EtterCollege of Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth J RaganDepartment of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Rachael CampionCollege of Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
David MartinezCollege of Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher J GillDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. cgill@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3353-0617
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many low and middle-income countries (LMICs), difficulties in patient identification are a major obstacle to the delivery of longitudinal care. In absence of unique identifiers, biometrics have emerged as an attractive solution to the identification problem. We developed an mHealth App for subject identification using pattern recognition around ear morphology (Project SEARCH (Scanning EARS for Child Health). Early field work with the SEARCH App revealed that image stabilization would be required for optimum performance.

methodsTo improve image capture, we designed and tested a device (the 'Donut'), which standardizes distance, angle, rotation and lighting. We then ran an experimental trial with 194 participants to measure the impact of the Donut on identification rates. Images of the participant's left ear were taken both with and without use of the Donut, then processed by the SEARCH algorithm, measuring the top one and top ten most likely matches.

resultsWith the Donut, the top one identification rate and top ten identification rates were 99.5 and 99.5%, respectively, vs. 38.4 and 24.1%, respectively, without the Donut (P < 0.0001 for each comparison). In sensitivity analyses, crop technique during pre-processing of images had a powerful impact on identification rates, but this too was facilitated through the Donut.

conclusionsBy standardizing lighting, angle and spatial location of the ear, the Donut achieved near perfect identification rates on a cohort of 194 participants, proving the feasibility and effectiveness of using the ear as a biometric identifier.

trial registrationThis study did not include a medical intervention or assess a medical outcome, and therefore did not meet the definition of a human subjects research study as defined by FDAAA. We did not register our study under clinicaltrials.gov .

Indexed as

Biometric IdentificationEarGlobal HealthPatient Identification SystemsAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleTelemedicineEar biometricsElectronic medical recordGlobal healthIdentificationImage stabilizationPatient identificationPattern recognition algorithmPublic health

Identifiers

PMID31215427
PMCPMC6580478
OpenAlexW2949311106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.