ArticleBMC genomics2019
DNA N6-Methyladenosine modification role in transmitted variations from genomic DNA to RNA in Herrania umbratica.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distribution patterns of N6-methyladenine in the rye genome.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Selective Effect of DNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification on Transcriptional Genetic Variations in East Asian Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Distribution Patterns of DNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Non-coding RNA Genes.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- DNA N6-Methyladenine Modification in Wild and Cultivated Soybeans Reveals Different Patterns in Nucleus and Cytoplasm.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification. Recently the developed single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing technology provided an efficient way to detect DNA N6-methyladenine (6mA) modification that played an important role in epigenetic and positively regulated gene expression. In addition, the gene expression was also regulated by genetic variation. However, the relationship between DNA 6mA modification and variation is still unknown.
resultsWe collected the SMRT long-reads DNA, Illumina short reads DNA and RNA datasets from the young leaves of Herrania umbratica, and used them to detect 35,654 6mA modification sites, 829,894 DNA variations and 60,672 RNA variations respectively, among which, there are 303 DNA variations and 19 RNA variations with 6mA modification, and 57,468 transmitted genetic variations from DNA to RNA. The results illustrated that the genes with 6mA modification were significant disadvantage to mutate than those genes without modification (p-value< 4.9e-08). And result from the linear regression model showed the 6mA densities of genes were associated with the transmitted variations type 0/1 to 1/1 (p-value < 0.001).
conclusionsThe variations of DNA and RNA in genes with 6mA modification were significant less than those in unmodified genes. Furthermore, the variations in 6mA modified genes were easily transmitted from DNA to RNA, especially the transmitted variation from DNA heterozygote to RNA homozygote.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.