Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215180›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2019

Properties of neurons in the superficial laminae of trigeminal nucleus caudalis.

Bruno Pradier, Samuel J McCormick, Ayumi C Tsuda, Rudy W Chen, Abigail L Atkinson, Mollie R Westrick, Caroline L Buckholtz, Julie A Kauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The fifth cranial nerve in headaches.The journal of headache and pain · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruno PradierDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.
Samuel J McCormickDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ayumi C TsudaDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.
Rudy W ChenDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.
Abigail L AtkinsonDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.
Mollie R WestrickDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.
Caroline L BuckholtzDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.
Julie A KauerDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology & Biotechnology, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Providence, Rhode Island.ORCID 0000-0002-3362-1642
Allen Institute for Brain Science · US

Funding

NIH HHS NS088453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNc) receives extensive afferent innervation from peripheral sensory neurons of the trigeminal ganglion (TG), and is the first central relay in the circuitry underpinning orofacial pain. Despite the initial characterization of the neurons in the superficial laminae, many questions remain. Here we report on electrophysiological properties of 535 superficial lamina I/II TNc neurons. Based on their firing pattern, we assigned these cells to five main groups, including (1) tonic, (2) phasic, (3) delayed, (4) H-current, and (5) tonic-phasic neurons, groups that exhibit distinct intrinsic properties and share some similarity with groups identified in the spinal dorsal horn. Driving predominantly nociceptive TG primary afferents using optogenetic stimulation in TRPV1/ChR2 animals, we found that tonic and H-current cells are most likely to receive pure monosynaptic input, whereas delayed neurons are more likely to exhibit inputs that appear polysynaptic. Finally, for the first time in TNc neurons, we used unsupervised clustering analysis methods and found that the kinetics of the action potentials and other intrinsic properties of these groups differ significantly from one another. Unsupervised spectral clustering based solely on a single voltage response to rheobase current was sufficient to group cells with shared properties independent of action potential discharge pattern, indicating that this approach can be effectively applied to identify functional neuronal subclasses. Together, our data illustrate that cells in the TNc with distinct patterns of TRPV1/ChR2 afferent innervation are physiologically diverse, but can be understood as a few major groups of cells having shared functional properties.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsCluster AnalysisElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked PotentialsFemaleMaleMembrane PotentialsMice, KnockoutNeuronsNeurons, AfferentNuclear LaminaOptogeneticsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhotic StimulationTRPV1 protein, mouseTRPV Cation ChannelsCraniofacialelectrophysiological propertiesneuronal classificationtrigeminalwaveform

Identifiers

PMID31215180
PMCPMC6581829
OpenAlexW2949418652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.