Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215168›Full record

Observational studyCancer medicine2019

Survival analysis and sentinel lymph node status in thin cutaneous melanoma: A multicenter observational study.

Antonio Tejera-Vaquerizo, Simone Ribero, Susana Puig, Aram Boada, Sabela Paradela, David Moreno-Ramírez, Javier Cañueto, Blanca de Unamuno, Ana Brinca, Miguel A Descalzo-Gallego and 26 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tissue Biomarkers Predicting Lymph Node Status in Cutaneous Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Dermoscopic Features as Predictors ofDermatology practical & conceptual · 2021
    Review
  17. Re-evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Antonio Tejera-VaquerizoDermatology Department, Instituto Dermatológico GlobalDerm, Palma del Río, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8987-0744
Simone RiberoMedical Sciences Department, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-1406
Susana PuigMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Aram BoadaDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trial i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9809-5308
Sabela ParadelaDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de la Coruña, La Coruña, Spain.
David Moreno-RamírezMelanoma Unit, Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Javier CañuetoServicio de Dermatología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0037-7353
Blanca de UnamunoDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Ana BrincaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel A Descalzo-GallegoUnidad de Investigación, Academia Española de Dermatología, Fundación Piel Sana, Madrid, Spain.
Simona Osella-AbateMedical Sciences Department, Section of Surgical Pathology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paola CassoniMedical Sciences Department, Section of Surgical Pathology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Cristina CarreraMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Sergi Vidal-SicartNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni BennássarMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Ramón RullSurgery Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Llucìa AlosPathology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Celia RequenaDermatology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Isidro BolumarSurgery Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Víctor TravesPathology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
Ángel PlaOtorhinolaringology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
A Fernández-OrlandMelanoma Unit, Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Ane JakaDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trial i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
María T Fernández-FigueresPathology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trial i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Josep M HilariDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trial i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Pol Giménez-XavierMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo VieiraDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Rafael Botella-EstradaDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Concepción Román-CurtoServicio de Dermatología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Lara FerrándizMelanoma Unit, Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Nicolás Iglesias-PenaDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de la Coruña, La Coruña, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7282-5015
Carlos FerrándizDepartamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trial i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Josep MalvehyMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d'investigacions biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Pietro QuaglinoMedical Sciences Department, Section of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Eduardo NagoreDermatology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.
SENTIMEL group
Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESUniversity of Turin · ITCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESSpanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

STATISTICAL METHODS IN EPIDEMIOLOGYF06TW001617 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRESLOW, NORMAN E · 1990 to 1991
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitotic rate is no longer considered a staging criterion for thin melanoma in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. The aim of this observational study was to identify prognostic factors for thin melanoma and predictors and prognostic significance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement in a large multicenter cohort of patients with melanoma from nine tertiary care hospitals. A total of 4249 consecutive patients with thin melanoma diagnosed from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2016 were included. The main outcomes were disease-free interval and melanoma-specific survival for the overall population and predictors of SLN metastasis (n = 1083). Associations between survival and SLN status and different clinical and pathologic variables (sex, age, tumor location, mitosis, ulceration, regression, lymphovascular invasion, histologic subtype, Clark level, and Breslow thickness) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression. SLN status was the most important prognostic factor for melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio, 13.8; 95% CI, 6.1-31.2; P < 0.001), followed by sex, ulceration, and Clark level for patients who underwent SLNB. A mitotic rate of >2 mitoses/mm

Indexed as

AdultAgedCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySkin NeoplasmsSurvival Analysisage factorsCox proportional hazards regression analysismelanomamitotic indexmultiple imputationneoplasia stagingprognostic factorssentinel lymph node biopsysurvival

Identifiers

PMID31215168
PMCPMC6675713
OpenAlexW2952857864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.