Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215138›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2019

A way forward with eco evo devo: an extended theory of resource polymorphism with postglacial fishes as model systems.

Skúli Skúlason, Kevin J Parsons, Richard Svanbäck, Katja Räsänen, Moira M Ferguson, Colin E Adams, Per-Arne Amundsen, Pia Bartels, Colin W Bean, Janette W Boughman and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Divergence of ontogenetic dietary shifts in adaptive radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The evolutionary consequences of learning under competition.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Skúli SkúlasonDepartment of Aquaculture and Fish Biology, Hólar University, Sauðárkrókur, 551, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-8191-3981
Kevin J ParsonsInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, U.K.
Richard SvanbäckAnimal Ecology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala, SE-752 36, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3221-4559
Katja RäsänenDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, and Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH-Zurich, Ueberlandstrasse 133, CH-8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Moira M FergusonDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
Colin E AdamsScottish Centre for Ecology and the Natural Environment, IBAHCM, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K.
Per-Arne AmundsenFreshwater Ecology Group, Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsö, Tromsö, N-9037, Norway.
Pia BartelsDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-90187, Sweden.
Colin W BeanScottish Natural Heritage, Caspian House, Mariner Court, Clydebank Business Park, Clydebank, G81 2NR, U.K.
Janette W BoughmanDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A.
Göran EnglundDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-90187, Sweden.
Jóhannes GuðbrandssonInstitute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland.
Oliver E HookerPR statistics LTD, 53 Morrison Street, Glasgow, G5 8LB, UK.
Alan G HudsonDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-90187, Sweden.
Kimmo K KahilainenInland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Campus Evenstad, Anne Evenstadvei 80, Koppang, NO-2480, Norway.
Rune KnudsenFreshwater Ecology Group, Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsö, Tromsö, N-9037, Norway.
Bjarni K KristjánssonDepartment of Aquaculture and Fish Biology, Hólar University, Sauðárkrókur, 551, Iceland.
Camille A-L LeblancDepartment of Aquaculture and Fish Biology, Hólar University, Sauðárkrókur, 551, Iceland.
Zophonías JónssonInstitute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland.
Gunnar ÖhlundDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-90187, Sweden.
Carl SmithSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AJ, U.K.
Sigurður S SnorrasonInstitute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 101, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of evolutionary science is to understand how biological diversity is generated and altered. Despite considerable advances, we still have limited insight into how phenotypic variation arises and is sorted by natural selection. Here we argue that an integrated view, which merges ecology, evolution and developmental biology (eco evo devo) on an equal footing, is needed to understand the multifaceted role of the environment in simultaneously determining the development of the phenotype and the nature of the selective environment, and how organisms in turn affect the environment through eco evo and eco devo feedbacks. To illustrate the usefulness of an integrated eco evo devo perspective, we connect it with the theory of resource polymorphism (i.e. the phenotypic and genetic diversification that occurs in response to variation in available resources). In so doing, we highlight fishes from recently glaciated freshwater systems as exceptionally well-suited model systems for testing predictions of an eco evo devo framework in studies of diversification. Studies on these fishes show that intraspecific diversity can evolve rapidly, and that this process is jointly facilitated by (i) the availability of diverse environments promoting divergent natural selection; (ii) dynamic developmental processes sensitive to environmental and genetic signals; and (iii) eco evo and eco devo feedbacks influencing the selective and developmental environments of the phenotype. We highlight empirical examples and present a conceptual model for the generation of resource polymorphism - emphasizing eco evo devo, and identify current gaps in knowledge.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDevelopmental BiologyEcologyFishesAdaptation, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystemEnvironmentFresh WaterGenetic SpeciationModels, AnimalPhenotypePolymorphism, GeneticSelection, Geneticdivergent evolutionepigeneticsgeneticsnatural selectionniche constructionnon-genetic inheritancephenotypephenotypic plasticitypolymorphic fishesspeciation

Identifiers

PMID31215138
PMCPMC6852119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.