Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31215052›Full record

ReviewBioelectromagnetics2019

Effects of RF-EMF on the Human Resting-State EEG-the Inconsistencies in the Consistency. Part 1: Non-Exposure-Related Limitations of Comparability Between Studies.

Heidi Danker-Hopfe, Torsten Eggert, Hans Dorn, Cornelia Sauter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioelectromagnetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04571775 (Investigation of Possible Effects of a Lifestyle Product in a Double-blind Pre-Post-Between-Groups Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04571775 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of Possible Effects of a Lifestyle Product in a Double-blind Pre-Post-Between-Groups Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorWaveguard GmbHRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsHealthy LifestyleArmsQi-Shield user group, Sham Qi-Shield user group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heidi Danker-HopfeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7001-1715
Torsten EggertDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hans DornDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia SauterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Competence Centre of Sleep Medicine at Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of studies on possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) on human waking electroencephalography (EEG) have been quite heterogeneous. In the majority of studies, changes in the alpha-frequency range in subjects who were exposed to different signals of mobile phone-related EMF sources were observed, whereas other studies did not report any effects. In this review, possible reasons for these inconsistencies are presented and recommendations for future waking EEG studies are made. The physiological basis of underlying brain activity, and the technical requirements and framework conditions for conducting and analyzing the human resting-state EEG are discussed. Peer-reviewed articles on possible effects of EMF on waking EEG were evaluated with regard to non-exposure-related confounding factors. Recommendations derived from international guidelines on the analysis and reporting of findings are proposed to achieve comparability in future studies. In total, 22 peer-reviewed studies on possible RF-EMF effects on human resting-state EEG were analyzed. EEG power in the alpha frequency range was reported to be increased in 10, decreased in four, and not affected in eight studies. All reviewed studies differ in several ways in terms of the methodologies applied, which might contribute to different results and conclusions about the impact of EMF on human resting-state EEG. A discussion of various study protocols and different outcome parameters prevents a scientifically sound statement on the impact of RF-EMF on human brain activity in resting-state EEG. Further studies which apply comparable, standardized study protocols are recommended. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;40:291-318. © 2019 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyBrainCell PhoneElectromagnetic FieldsFemaleHumansMaleRadiation ExposureRadio Wavesalpha band powerbrain activityelectroencephalographymobile phoneradiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID31215052
PMCPMC6619284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.