Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31214997›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2019

Randomized Multicenter Evaluation of Quality of Life and Treatment Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Receiving Once-Weekly Trelagliptin Versus a Daily Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor.

Hitoshi Ishii, Yuki Suzaki, Yuko Miyata, Shingo Matsui

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03014479 (Study of the QOL Evaluation of Trelagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03014479 phase4completednot on this map

Study of the QOL Evaluation of Trelagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorTakedaRan2017 to 2017Enrolled219ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsTrelagliptin, Daily DPP-4 inhibitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hitoshi IshiiDepartment of Diabetology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Yuki SuzakiJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko MiyataJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo MatsuiJapan Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Tokyo, Japan. shingo.matsui@takeda.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-2135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an established treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this study was to investigate differences in quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction among treatment-naïve T2DM patients receiving once-weekly trelagliptin or a daily DPP-4 inhibitor.

methodsIn this multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IV study conducted in Japan, 218 patients were randomized to trelagliptin 100 mg once weekly or a once- or twice-daily DPP-4 inhibitor for 12 weeks (NCT03014479; JapicCTI-173482). QOL and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), respectively. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in DTR-QOL total score at week 12. Secondary endpoints included further analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ components. Other endpoints included glycemic control, treatment adherence, and safety.

resultsThe between-group difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in DTR-QOL total score was 2.418 (95% confidence interval - 1.546, 6.382; P = 0.2305). Analysis of the DTR-QOL and DTSQ results by subscales and stratification generally showed a numerical improvement with trelagliptin over daily DPP-4 inhibitors. QOL and treatment satisfaction improved with a reduction in frequency of concurrent and study drug dosing. Treatment adherence was > 97% for both groups. The effect of trelagliptin on glycemic control was similar to that seen with daily DPP-4 inhibitors. Trelagliptin and daily DPP-4 inhibitors were well-tolerated and demonstrated similar safety profiles.

conclusionsOnce-weekly trelagliptin 100 mg administered for 12 weeks resulted in a numerically, but not statistically, greater improvement in QOL and treatment satisfaction versus daily DPP-4 inhibitors. The decision to administer once-weekly or daily DPP-4 inhibitor treatment is likely to depend on patient preferences and the treatment policies of physicians.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03014479) and JAPIC (JapicCTI-173482).

fundingTakeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.

Indexed as

AdherenceDPP-4 inhibitorsDTR-QOLQuality of lifeTreatment satisfactionTrelagliptinType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31214997
PMCPMC6612345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.