Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31214975›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2019

Extending Data for Urban Health Decision-Making: a Menu of New and Potential Neighborhood-Level Health Determinants Datasets in LMICs.

Dana R Thomson, Catherine Linard, Sabine Vanhuysse, Jessica E Steele, Michal Shimoni, José Siri, Waleska Teixeira Caiaffa, Megumi Rosenberg, Eléonore Wolff, Taïs Grippa and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Dana R ThomsonFlowminder Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden. dana.r.thomson@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9507-9123
Catherine LinardDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sabine VanhuysseDepartment of Geosciences, Environment and Society (DGES-IGEAT), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Jessica E SteeleDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Michal ShimoniSignal and Image Centre, Faculty of Electrical engineering, Royal Military Academy, Brussels, Belgium.
José SiriInternational Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Waleska Teixeira CaiaffaObservatory for Urban Health in Belo Horizonte, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Megumi RosenbergCenter for Health Development, World Health Organization, Kobe, Japan.
Eléonore WolffDepartment of Geosciences, Environment and Society (DGES-IGEAT), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Taïs GrippaDepartment of Geosciences, Environment and Society (DGES-IGEAT), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Stefanos GeorganosDepartment of Geosciences, Environment and Society (DGES-IGEAT), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Helen ElseyNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEFlowminder Foundation · SERoyal Military Academy · BEUnited Nations University-International Institute for Global Health · MYUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P024718/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Area-level indicators of the determinants of health are vital to plan and monitor progress toward targets such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Tools such as the Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART) and UN-Habitat Urban Inequities Surveys identify dozens of area-level health determinant indicators that decision-makers can use to track and attempt to address population health burdens and inequalities. However, questions remain as to how such indicators can be measured in a cost-effective way. Area-level health determinants reflect the physical, ecological, and social environments that influence health outcomes at community and societal levels, and include, among others, access to quality health facilities, safe parks, and other urban services, traffic density, level of informality, level of air pollution, degree of social exclusion, and extent of social networks. The identification and disaggregation of indicators is necessarily constrained by which datasets are available. Typically, these include household- and individual-level survey, census, administrative, and health system data. However, continued advancements in earth observation (EO), geographical information system (GIS), and mobile technologies mean that new sources of area-level health determinant indicators derived from satellite imagery, aggregated anonymized mobile phone data, and other sources are also becoming available at granular geographic scale. Not only can these data be used to directly calculate neighborhood- and city-level indicators, they can be combined with survey, census, administrative and health system data to model household- and individual-level outcomes (e.g., population density, household wealth) with tremendous detail and accuracy. WorldPop and the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) have already modeled dozens of household survey indicators at country or continental scales at resolutions of 1 × 1 km or even smaller. This paper aims to broaden perceptions about which types of datasets are available for health and development decision-making. For data scientists, we flag area-level indicators at city and sub-city scales identified by health decision-makers in the SDGs, Urban HEART, and other initiatives. For local health decision-makers, we summarize a menu of new datasets that can be feasibly generated from EO, mobile phone, and other spatial data-ideally to be made free and publicly available-and offer lay descriptions of some of the difficulties in generating such data products.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisDecision MakingHealth EquityHealth StatusCitiesDeveloping CountriesHumansResidence CharacteristicsUrban HealthGISMobile phone dataSatellite imagerySpatial data

Identifiers

PMID31214975
PMCPMC6677870
OpenAlexW2949541851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.