ArticleMolecular biology reports2019
The clinical and prognostic value of miR-9 gene expression in Tunisian patients with bladder cancer.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanorobots and Exosomes: Driving the New Frontier for Bladder Tumors through Non-Coding RNAs.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Article
- The Role of miRNAs to Detect Progression, Stratify, and Predict Relevant Clinical Outcomes in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Chrysophanol suppresses growth and metastasis of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia via miR-9/PD-L1 axis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a major need for the identification of biomarkers, which are able to guide personalized therapy for bladder cancer, in particular after resection of the primary tumor. Specifically, miR-9 upregulation has been preliminarily associated with a more aggressive phenotype of bladder cancer, namely muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HG NMIBC). In order to explore the potential utility of miR-9 as a biomarker in bladder cancer, we have investigated its expression pattern in a sample of Tunisian patients who have undergone primary resection. This is a retrospective study performed on BCa samples from 90 patients (44 specimens of HG NMIBC, 23 specimens of LG NMIBC, and 23 specimens of MIBC). Ten samples from the non-tumoral zone of cystectomy specimens were used as controls. For each specimen, we measured miR-9 expression and correlated it with the clinical characteristics of the patients. Overall, miR-9 was overexpressed in MIBC compared to NMIBC specimens (median fold change [FC]: - 8.89 vs 1.41, p = 0.001). Similarly, miR-9 expression was significantly different in LG NMIBC, HG NMIBC and MIBC subgroups (median FC: 0.68, 2.14 and 8.89, respectively; p = 0.001). ROC analysis showed that miR-9 expression pattern could be used as potential biomarker for distinguishing NMIBC subgroups: indeed miR-9 expression is relatively low in LG NMIBC and high in HG NMIBC. The thresholds are estimated at 0.063 and 21.597, respectively. Moreover, miR-9 was associated with a higher risk of progression. This study suggests the clinical value of miR-9 as a prognostic factor in bladder cancer after tumor resection. Should the prognostic ability of miR-9 be confirmed in larger studies, also on different ethnic groups, it would be useful to investigate whether urine sampling-which is easier to perform, less invasive and less costly-can provide the same results as analysis on surgical specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.