Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31214943›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020

Safety and Stability of Two Potentially Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains After In Vitro Gastrointestinal Transit.

Wilson José Fernandes Lemos Junior, André Fioravante Guerra, Armin Tarrah, Vinícius da Silva Duarte, Alessio Giacomini, Rosa Helena Luchese, Viviana Corich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Infant-derivedFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigation of Probiotic Properties ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  5. Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Growth Parameters and Survivability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wilson José Fernandes Lemos JuniorDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
André Fioravante GuerraFederal Center of Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Valença, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Armin TarrahDepartment of Agronomy Food Natural resources Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Vinícius da Silva DuarteDepartment of Agronomy Food Natural resources Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Alessio GiacominiDepartment of Agronomy Food Natural resources Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy. alessio.giacomini@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0003-4124-0142
Rosa Helena LucheseDepartment of Food Technology, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Viviana CorichDepartment of Agronomy Food Natural resources Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITFederal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to FAO and WHO, probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. Most probiotic bacteria used today belong to the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium and are of animal or human origin. The fundamental characteristic routinely evaluated in potential probiotics strains is their limited viability loss during gastrointestinal transit (GIT), but to date, no studies reported whether probiotics, besides viability, still also maintain their beneficial properties intact. To study this aspect, we considered two strains, Lactobacillus rhamnosus DTA 79 and L. paracasei DTA 83, previously characterised for the presence of some probiotic properties, isolated from faeces of 7- to 21-day-old babies. Here, we examined some additional properties, namely antibiotic resistance, resistance to lysozyme, presence of haemolytic activity and inhibition of pathogen biofilm formation. We then tested the effect of in vitro GIT on all these features and our results show evidence that this procedure had in some cases limited and in others no significant effects on them. Additionally, we examined the gastrointestinal resistance of the strains after skim milk fermentation and successive storage of the product for 20 and 40 days at refrigeration temperature, to see whether prolonged storage could weaken cell resistance to GIT. Our results demonstrate that a protracted refrigeration period before in vitro GIT did not affect or influenced very weakly this essential probiotic property.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal TransitProbioticsCell SurvivalDrug Resistance, BacterialFecesHumansInfant, NewbornLacticaseibacillus paracaseiLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusBiofilmDairyLactobacillus paracaseiLactobacillus rhamnosusProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID31214943
OpenAlexW2949834812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.