ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
What are the skills that represent expert-level laparoscopic suturing? A Delphi Study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinguishing Intermediate and Novice Surgeons by Eye Movements.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the field of laparoscopic surgery grows, the need for a valid assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills becomes apparent. The objective of this study was to identify laparoscopic suturing skills reflective of performing at an expert level.
methodsA Delphi Study was conducted with expert laparoscopic surgeons. Tasks were considered to meet criteria for consensus after 80% of survey participants answered "strongly agree." Results of the previous round of surveys were shared with participants at the start of the next round. The predefined endpoint for the Delphi was set as maximum of three rounds, reaching 80% consensus on each skill, or if > 50% of initial respondents fail to return for subsequent surveys.
resultsAfter three rounds of surveys completed by 13 advanced laparoscopic surgeons, 8 observed skills met consensus (> 80% selected "strongly agree"): forehand suturing, continuous suturing, avoiding tissue trauma, achieving a technically acceptable final product (tight closure), tying a secure knot at the end of suturing, maintaining/checking for appropriate tightness of running suture, accurate depth perception, and loading the needle in < 3 attempts. Skills that approached consensus (with > 50% ranking them as "strongly agree") included correct penetration of target tissue, ability to create a surgeon's knot, awareness of needle tip position, confined space suturing, following the curve of the needle, smooth movements of instruments, loading the needle correctly, adjusting for tissue thickness, and bimanual dexterity.
conclusionsUsing Delphi methodology, we identified the skills that are representative of expert laparoscopic suturing. This information can be used to create an assessment tool for this domain. Validation of such a tool will help advance the surgical field towards true competency-based assessment of expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31214806What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.