ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Visual feedback is not necessary for recalibrating the vestibular contribution to the dynamic phase of a perturbation recovery response.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison Between Effects of Galvanic and Vibration-Based Vestibular Stimulation on Postural Control and Gait Performance in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Pooled it
- Editorial: Neurostimulation: exploring perceptual & cognitive enhancement.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Innovative approaches for managing patients with chronic vestibular disorders: follow-up indicators and predictive markers for studying the vestibular error signal.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Article
- Developing Proprioceptive Countermeasures to Mitigate Postural and Locomotor Control Deficits After Long-Duration Spaceflight.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our recent work demonstrated that vision can recalibrate the vestibular signal used to re-establish equilibrium following a platform perturbation. Here, we investigate whether vision provided during a platform perturbation can recalibrate the use of vestibular reafference during the dynamic phase of the perturbation response. Dynamic postural responses were examined during a series of five forward perturbations to the body, while galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) selectively altered vestibular feedback and LCD occlusion spectacles controlled visual availability. Responses with and without vision were compared. The presence of GVS caused 1.78 ± 0.19 cm of medio-lateral (ML) body motion toward the anode during the initial 3 s of the dynamic postural response across perturbations. This dynamic ML response was attenuated across perturbations 1-3 independent of visual availability, resulting in a significant reduction of ML center of mass and pressure deviations (p < 0.01, ƞ
Indexed as
Identifiers
31214739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.