ArticleLab on a chip2019
3D-printing enabled micro-assembly of a microfluidic electroporation system for 3D tissue engineering.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scalable synthetic peptide hydrogel enables self-organized luminal cavity architecture within hiPSC 3D colonies supporting functional hepatocyte differentiation.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- A critical review of microfluidic electroporation for therapeutic cell engineering.Cell reports. Physical science · 2026Article
- Development of a Microwell System for Reproducible Formation of Homogeneous Cell Spheroids.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Characterization of glioma spheroid viability and metastatic potential following monophasic and biphasic pulsed electric fields.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Microfluidic Electroporation Arrays for Investigating Electroporation-Induced Cellular Rupture Dynamics.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Electrokinetic Manipulation of Biological Cells towards Biotechnology Applications.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of Experimental Electrical and Biological Parameters on Gene Transfer by Electroporation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- M-TUBE enables large-volume bacterial gene delivery using a high-throughput microfluidic electroporation platform.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Microscale Electroporation.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Recent innovations in cost-effective polymer and paper hybrid microfluidic devices.Lab on a chip · 2021Review
- Cancer spheroids derived exosomes reveal more molecular features relevant to progressed cancer.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2021Article
- CRISPR-Associated (CAS) Effectors Delivery via Microfluidic Cell-Deformation Chip.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Advances in 3D peptide hydrogel models in cancer research.NPJ science of food · 2021Review
- 3D printing of tissue engineering scaffolds: a focus on vascular regeneration.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2021Review
- A review of emerging physical transfection methods for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing.Theranostics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Electro-transfection is an essential workhorse tool for regulating cellular responses and engineering cellular materials in tissue engineering. However, most of the existing approaches are only focused on cell suspensions in vitro, which fails to mimic an in vivo tissue microenvironment regarding the 3D electric field distribution and mass transport in a biological matrix. However, building a 3D electro-transfection system that is compatible with 3D cell culture for mimicking the in vivo tissue microenvironment is challenging, due to the substantial difficulties in control of the 3D electric field distribution as well as the cellular growth. To address such challenges, we introduce a novel 3D micro-assembly strategy assisted by 3D printing, which enables the molding of 3D microstructures as LEGO® parts from 3D-printed molds. The molded PDMS LEGO® bricks are then assembled into a 3D-cell culture chamber interconnected with vertical and horizontal perfusion microchannels as a 3D channel network. Such a 3D perfusion microchannel network is unattainable by direct 3D printing or other microfabrication approaches, which can facilitate the highly-efficient exchange of nutrition and waste for 3D cell growth. Four flat electrodes are mounted into the 3D culture chamber via a 3D-printed holder and controlled by a programmable power sequencer for multi-directional electric frequency scanning (3D μ-electro-transfection). This multi-directional scanning not only can create transient pores all over the cell membrane, but also can generate local oscillation for enhancing mass transport and improving cell transfection efficiency. As a proof-of-concept, we electro-delivered the pAcGFP1-C1 vector to 3D cultured HeLa cells within peptide hydrogel scaffolding. The expressed GFP level from transfected HeLa cells reflects the transfection efficiency. We found two key parameters including electric field strength and plasmid concentration playing more important roles than the pulse duration and duty cycles. The results showed an effective transfection efficiency of ∼15% with ∼85% cell viability, which is 3-fold higher compared to that of the conventional benchtop 3D cell electro-transfection. This 3D μ-electrotransfection system was further used for genetically editing 3D-cultured Hek-293 cells via direct delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid which showed successful transfection with GFP expressed in the cytoplasm as the reporter. The 3D-printing enabled micro-assembly allows facile creation of a novel 3D culture system for electro-transfection, which can be employed for versatile gene delivery and cellular engineering, as well as building in vivo like tissue models for fundamentally studying cellular regulation mechanisms at the molecular level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.