Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31214620›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2019

Comparison of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors between Older and Younger Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Leyin Zhang, Leitao Sun, Jieru Yu, Feiyu Shan, Kai Zhang, Xi Pang, Chenghao Ma, Yinan Zhang, Minhe Shen, Shenglin Ma and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. [Analysis of the Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients with Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Aging, cancer, and antitumor immunity.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Leyin ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7211-7094
Leitao SunThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-3899
Jieru YuCollege of Basic Medical Science, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Feiyu ShanThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8115-4965
Kai ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Xi PangThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Chenghao MaThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Yinan ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.
Minhe ShenDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7321-3830
Shenglin MaDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Fourth Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China.
Shanming RuanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1061-5255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite the fact that it is widely acknowledged that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) rely on the presence of immune response to take their antitumor effect, little is known whether there is an influence exerted on the efficacy of ICIs based on patients' age. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of ICIs between younger and older patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched online database and major conference proceedings for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published of ICIs and included RCTs that conducted subgroup comparisons of age with available combination of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Subsequently, we figured out the pooled HR and 95%CI in younger and older patients with a random-effects model and evaluated the within-study heterogeneity by using subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analysis. RESULTS AND

conclusionA total of 12 eligible RCTs included in our study, which reported OS according to patients' age. The overall estimated random-effects for HR was 0.75 with 95% CI of 0.65-0.87 in younger arm versus 0.81 with 95% CI of 0.72-0.92 in older arm. ICIs can improve OS for patients with advanced or metastatic lung cancer when compared to controls, especially for those patients with NSCLC, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, non-squamous, Pembrolizumab or Atezolizumab used as well as subsequent-line setting, and the magnitude of benefit in OS had comparable efficacy in both younger and older arms using a cut-off of 65 yr. Conversely, we also drew a statically significant conclusion that older patients failed to acquire benefit from ICIs when subdivided with a further cut-off of 75 yr.

Indexed as

AgingModels, BiologicalAge FactorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agentsatezolizumabpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID31214620
PMCPMC6535828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.