Trial reportNeural plasticity2019
The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Symptoms in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.
Trial report in Neural plasticity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03627416 (A Pilot Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improvement of Gait in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia and Adrenomyeloneuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improvement of Gait in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia and Adrenomyeloneuropathy
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-pharmacological treatment of hereditary spastic paraplegia: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Pooled it
- Gait analysis patterns and rehabilitative interventions to improve gait in persons with hereditary spastic paraplegia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- ZiclagueOrphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Trial
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Spasticity in Stroke and Other Neuromotor Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Fostering tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to treat musculoskeletal disorders in bone and muscle.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Burden of illness and mortality in men with Adrenomyeloneuropathy: a retrospective cohort study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Hereditary spastic paraplegia: Novel insights into the pathogenesis and management.SAGE open medicine · 2024Review
- The therapeutic effects of physical treatment for patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Tool in Various Types of Dementia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Recent advances in understanding hereditary spastic paraplegias and emerging therapies.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) is a heterogeneous group of inherited disorders affecting predominantly the motor cortex and pyramidal tract, which results in slowly progressing gait disorders, as well as spasticity and weakness of lower extremities. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been previously investigated as a therapeutic tool for similar motor deficits in a number of neurologic conditions. The aim of this randomized, controlled trial was to investigate the therapeutic potential of rTMS in various forms of HSP, including pure and complicated forms, as well as adrenomyeloneuropathy. Methods: We recruited 15 patients (five women and 10 men; mean age 43.7 ± 10.6 years) with the mentioned forms of HSP. The intervention included five sessions of bilateral 10 Hz rTMS over primary motor areas of the muscles of lower extremities and five sessions of similar sham stimulation. Results: One patient dropped out due to seizure, and 14 patients completed the study protocol. After real stimulation, the strength of the proximal and distal muscles of lower extremities increased, and the spasticity of the proximal muscles decreased. Change in spasticity was still present during follow-up assessment. No effect was observed regarding gait velocity. No changes were seen after sham stimulation. A post hoc analysis revealed an inverse relation between motor threshold and the change of the strength after active rTMS. Conclusions: rTMS may have potential in improving weakness and spasticity of lower extremities in HSP, especially of proximal muscles whose motor areas are located more superficially. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03627416.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.