Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31214020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2019

A New Pharmacophore Model for the Design of Sigma-1 Ligands Validated on a Large Experimental Dataset.

Rosalia Pascual, Carmen Almansa, Carlos Plata-Salamán, José Miguel Vela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. 2-{International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. MMP9 in pan-cancer and computational study to screen for MMP9 inhibitors.American journal of translational research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. InhibitingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosalia PascualESTEVE Pharmaceuticals S.A., Drug Discovery and Preclinical Development, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen AlmansaESTEVE Pharmaceuticals S.A., Drug Discovery and Preclinical Development, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Plata-SalamánESTEVE Pharmaceuticals S.A., Drug Discovery and Preclinical Development, Barcelona, Spain.
José Miguel VelaESTEVE Pharmaceuticals S.A., Drug Discovery and Preclinical Development, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent publication of the σ1R crystal structure is an important cornerstone for the derivation of more accurate activity prediction models. We report here a comparative study involving a set of more than 25,000 structures from our internal database that had been screened for σ1R affinity. Using the recently published crystal structure, 5HK1, two new pharmacophore models were generated. The first one,

Indexed as

5HK1crystal structuredockingpharmacophore modelsigma-1virtual screening

Identifiers

PMID31214020
PMCPMC6555132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.