Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Sparse Sampling of Silence Type I Errors With an Emphasis on Primary Auditory Cortex.

Francis A M Manno, Juan Fernandez-Ruiz, Sinai H C Manno, Shuk Han Cheng, Condon Lau, Fernando A Barrios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francis A M MannoInstituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.
Juan Fernandez-RuizFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Sinai H C MannoDepartment of Physics, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, China.
Shuk Han ChengDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, China.
Condon LauDepartment of Physics, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, China.
Fernando A BarriosInstituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Querétaro, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sparse sampling functional MRI (ssfMRI) enables stronger primary auditory cortex blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal by acquiring volumes interspersed with silence, reducing the physiological artifacts associated with scanner noise. Recent calculations of type I error rates associated with resting-state fMRI suggest that the techniques used to model the hemodynamic response function (HRF) might be resulting in higher false positives than is generally acceptable. In the present study, we analyze ssfMRI to determine type I error rates associated with whole brain and primary auditory cortex voxel-wise activation patterns. Study participants (

Indexed as

auditory cortexfalse positivesnull hypothesissparse sampling fMRItype I error rates

Identifiers

PMID31213968
PMCPMC6554478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.