Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213742›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2019

Validity and Reliability of Mini-Invasive Surgery Assisted by Ultrasound in Achilles Tendon Rupture.

Michele Bisaccia, Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Luigi Meccariello, Olga Bisaccia, Paolo Ceccarini, Giuseppe Rollo, Cristina Ibáñez-Vicente, Javier Cervera-Irimia, Felix Sánchez-Sánchez, Angela Ribes-Iborra and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele BisacciaDivision of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, "S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital", S. Andrea delleFratte, Perugia, Italy.
Giuseppe RinonapoliDivision of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, "S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital", S. Andrea delleFratte, Perugia, Italy.
Luigi MeccarielloDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Piazzetta Filippo Muratore, Block: A- Floor:V, Lecce, Italy.
Olga BisacciaSection of Diagnostic Imaging, "S. Carlo Hospital", Potenza, Italy.
Paolo CeccariniDivision of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, "S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital", S. Andrea delleFratte, Perugia, Italy.
Giuseppe RolloDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Piazzetta Filippo Muratore, Block: A- Floor:V, Lecce, Italy.
Cristina Ibáñez-VicenteDepartment of General Medicine, "Hospital de Getafe", Madrid, Spain.
Javier Cervera-IrimiaOrthopaedic and Trauma Surgeon "Hospital General de Villalba", ColladoVillalba, Spain.
Felix Sánchez-SánchezDivision of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, "ComplejoHospitalario Universitario de Toledo", Toledo, Spain.
Angela Ribes-IborraDepartment of Intensive Care, "Hospital Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Taulì" Sabadell, Barcellona, Spain.
David Gomez-GarridoOrthopaedic and Trauma Surgeon "Hospital General de Villalba", ColladoVillalba, Spain.
Auro CaraffaDivision of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Perugia, "S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital", S. Andrea delleFratte, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · ITComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo · ESCorporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture has become very popular in the last years, because of the good outcomes and the low re-rupture rate.

aimThe aim of this study is to compare the results between open surgery and percutaneous ultrasound-assisted surgery.

methodsAll patients who underwent an Achilles tendon surgical repair in the last 3 years were included, resulting in a total of 56 patients (40 M and 16 F) with an average age of 53 years. Of these patients, 36 were treated with an open suture, while 20 with a mini invasive ultrasound assisted suture. At a minimum follow-up of one year, patients were evaluated echografically, using both the Achilles Tendon Rupture Total score (ATRS) and the McComis score, and performing the ultrasounds bilaterally to assess both the structure and the diameter of tendons.

resultsBoth groups of patients showed an average ATRS score >80. The McComis score was 54.18 vs. 56.25 (p>0.05). Plantar flexion and dorsal flexion work were not similar (p>0.05). On average, the calf circumference of the operated side was decreased compared to the healthy side between the groups (p>0.05). The thickness of the operated tendons evaluated with ultrasound measurement compared to the average tendon, (p <0.05).

conclusionThe ultrasound-assisted tenorrhaphy is a reliable treatment with good clinical and functional outcomes; anyway, the percutaneous technique and the open surgery show similar results.

Indexed as

AchillesPercutaneousSutureTenorrhaphyUltrasound-assisted

Identifiers

PMID31213742
PMCPMC6511267
OpenAlexW2922248232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.