Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213644›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Locally advanced rectal cancer transcriptomic-based secretome analysis reveals novel biomarkers useful to identify patients according to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response.

Luisa Matos do Canto, Sarah Santiloni Cury, Mateus Camargo Barros-Filho, Bruna Elisa Catin Kupper, Maria Dirlei Ferreira de Souza Begnami, Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto, Robson Francisco Carvalho, Fabio Albuquerque Marchi, Dorte Aalund Olsen, Jonna Skov Madsen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. RecQ Helicase Somatic Alterations in Cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa Matos do CantoInternational Research Center - CIPE, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 04002-010, Brazil.
Sarah Santiloni CuryDepartment of Morphology - Institute of Bioscience, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, 18618689, Brazil.
Mateus Camargo Barros-FilhoInternational Research Center - CIPE, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 04002-010, Brazil.
Bruna Elisa Catin KupperDepartment of Pelvic Surgery, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 04002-010, Brazil.
Maria Dirlei Ferreira de Souza BegnamiDepartment of Pathology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 04002-010, Brazil.
Cristovam Scapulatempo-NetoMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos, and Diagnósticos da América (DASA), São Paulo, Brazil.
Robson Francisco CarvalhoDepartment of Morphology - Institute of Bioscience, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, 18618689, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4901-7714
Fabio Albuquerque MarchiInternational Research Center - CIPE, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 04002-010, Brazil.
Dorte Aalund OlsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
Jonna Skov MadsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-4714
Birgitte Mayland HavelundDanish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
Samuel AguiarDepartment of Pelvic Surgery, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, 04002-010, Brazil.
Silvia Regina RogattoDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, 7100, Denmark. silvia.regina.rogatto@rsyd.dk.
AC Camargo Hospital · BRUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRDASA (Brazil)Region of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) present incomplete pathological response (pIR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Despite the efforts to predict treatment response using tumor-molecular features, as differentially expressed genes, no molecule has proved to be a strong biomarker. The tumor secretome analysis is a promising strategy for biomarkers identification, which can be assessed using transcriptomic data. We performed transcriptomic-based secretome analysis to select potentially secreted proteins using an in silico approach. The tumor expression profile of 28 LARC biopsies collected before nCRT was compared with normal rectal tissues (NT). The expression profile showed no significant differences between complete (pCR) and incomplete responders to nCRT. Genes with increased expression (pCR = 106 and pIR = 357) were used for secretome analysis based on public databases (Vesiclepedia, Human Cancer Secretome, and Plasma Proteome). Seventeen potentially secreted candidates (pCR = 1, pIR = 13 and 3 in both groups) were further investigated in two independent datasets (TCGA and GSE68204) confirming their over-expression in LARC and association with nCRT response (GSE68204). The expression of circulating amphiregulin and cMET proteins was confirmed in serum from 14 LARC patients. Future studies in liquid biopsies could confirm the utility of these proteins for personalized treatment in LARC patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapyCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProteomeRectal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorProteome

Identifiers

PMID31213644
PMCPMC6582145
OpenAlexW2951465424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.