Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213531›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

On the power to detect rare recombination events.

Alison E Wright, Iulia Darolti, Natasha I Bloch, Vicencio Oostra, Benjamin A Sandkam, Séverine D Buechel, Niclas Kolm, Felix Breden, Beatriz Vicoso, Judith E Mank

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reply to Wright et al.: How to explain the absence of extensive Y-specific regions in the guppy sex chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alison E WrightDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; a.e.wright@sheffield.ac.uk.
Iulia DaroltiDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Natasha I BlochDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.
Vicencio OostraResearch Centre for Ecological Change, University of Helsinki, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-1906
Benjamin A SandkamDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Séverine D BuechelDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden.
Niclas KolmDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden.
Felix BredenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby V5A 1S6, Canada.
Beatriz VicosoInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Judith E MankDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticRecombination, GeneticAnimalsFishesMalePolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID31213531
PMCPMC6601268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.