Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213524›Full record

ArticlemSystems2019

Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake.

Ursula M McCormack, Tânia Curião, Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli, Elizabeth Magowan, Donagh P Berry, Henry Reyer, Maria L Prieto, Stefan G Buzoianu, Michael Harrison, Natalie Rebeiz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. EnterotoxigenicTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Copy Number Variation onMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ursula M McCormack *Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Tânia Curião *Teagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5269-0387
Barbara U Metzler-ZebeliInstitute of Animal Nutrition and Functional Plant Compounds, University Clinic for Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-4957
Elizabeth MagowanSustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland.
Donagh P BerryTeagasc, Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Henry ReyerLeibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Maria L PrietoDepartment of Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Co. Waterford, Ireland.
Stefan G BuzoianuTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Michael HarrisonDepartment of Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Co. Waterford, Ireland.
Natalie RebeizTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Fiona CrispieTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Paul D CotterTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Orla O'SullivanTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
Gillian E GardinerDepartment of Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Co. Waterford, Ireland.
Peadar G LawlorTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland peadar.lawlor@teagasc.ie.
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEWaterford Institute of Technology · IEResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal feed efficiency (FE) in pigs is important for economic and environmental reasons. Previous research identified FE-associated bacterial taxa within the intestinal microbiota of growing pigs. This study investigated whether FE-associated bacteria and selected FE-associated physiological traits were consistent across geographic locations (Republic of Ireland [ROI] [two batches of pigs, ROI1 and ROI2], Northern Ireland [NI], and Austria [AT]), where differences in genetic, dietary, and management factors were minimized. Pigs (

Indexed as

feed efficiencygeographic locationintestinal microbiotapigs

Identifiers

PMID31213524
PMCPMC6581691
OpenAlexW2951379543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.