Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213503›Full record

ArticleGenetics2019

Selection, Linkage, and Population Structure Interact To Shape Genetic Variation Among Threespine Stickleback Genomes.

Thomas C Nelson, Johnathan G Crandall, Catherine M Ituarte, Julian M Catchen, William A Cresko

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic changes underlying repeated niche shifts in an adaptive radiation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Threespine Stickleback: A Model System For Evolutionary Genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas C NelsonInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403.ORCID 0000-0003-0627-091X
Johnathan G CrandallInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-3135
Catherine M ItuarteInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403.
Julian M CatchenInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-660X
William A CreskoInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403 wcresko@uoregon.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3496-8074
University of Oregon · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

Graduate Training in Genetics Administrative Supplement - Career Curriculum DevelopmentT32GM007413 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 1985 to 2022
$7.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outcome of selection on genetic variation depends on the geographic organization of individuals and populations as well as the organization of loci within the genome. Spatially variable selection between marine and freshwater habitats has had a significant and heterogeneous impact on patterns of genetic variation across the genome of threespine stickleback fish. When marine stickleback invade freshwater habitats, more than a quarter of the genome can respond to divergent selection, even in as little as 50 years. This process largely uses standing genetic variation that can be found ubiquitously at low frequency in marine populations, can be millions of years old, and is likely maintained by significant bidirectional gene flow. Here, we combine population genomic data of marine and freshwater stickleback from Cook Inlet, Alaska, with genetic maps of stickleback fish derived from those same populations to examine how linkage to loci under selection affects genetic variation across the stickleback genome. Divergent selection has had opposing effects on linked genetic variation on chromosomes from marine and freshwater stickleback populations: near loci under selection, marine chromosomes are depauperate of variation, while these same regions among freshwater genomes are the most genetically diverse. Forward genetic simulations recapitulate this pattern when different selective environments also differ in population structure. Lastly, dense genetic maps demonstrate that the interaction between selection and population structure may impact large stretches of the stickleback genome. These findings advance our understanding of how the structuring of populations across geography influences the outcomes of selection, and how the recombination landscape broadens the genomic reach of selection.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkagePolymorphism, GeneticSelection, GeneticAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEcosystemGenetic SpeciationGenomeSmegmamorphaadaptationGasterosteus aculeatuslinked selectionPopulation genomicsrecombinationthreespine stickleback

Identifiers

PMID31213503
PMCPMC6707445
OpenAlexW2951529718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.