Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213186›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

The effects of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid on gene expression and DNA methylation in the buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris.

P S A Bebane, B J Hunt, M Pegoraro, A R C Jones, H Marshall, E Rosato, E B Mallon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Bees and pesticides: the research impact and scientometrics relations.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P S A Bebane1 Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK.
B J Hunt2 School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, John Moores University Liverpool , Liverpool L3 3AF , UK.
M Pegoraro1 Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK.
A R C Jones1 Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK.
H Marshall1 Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK.
E Rosato1 Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK.
E B Mallon1 Department of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK.
University of Leicester · GBLiverpool John Moores University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonicotinoids are effective insecticides used on many important arable and horticultural crops. They are nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists which disrupt the function of insect neurons and cause paralysis and death. In addition to direct mortality, there are numerous sublethal effects of low doses of neonicotinoids on bees. We hypothesize that some of these large array of effects could be a consequence of epigenetic changes in bees induced by neonicotinoids. We compared whole methylome (BS-seq) and RNA-seq libraries of the brains of buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris workers exposed to field-realistic doses of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid to libraries from control workers. We found numerous genes which show differential expression between neonicotinoid-treated bees and control bees, but no differentially methylated cytosines in any context. We found CpG methylation to be focused mainly in exons and associated with highly expressed genes. We discuss the implications of our results for future legislation.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsAnimalsBeesDNA MethylationGene ExpressionInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsimidaclopridInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsBS-seqepigeneticsmethylomepesticideRNA-seqsocial insects

Identifiers

PMID31213186
PMCPMC6599982
OpenAlexW2953082994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.