Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31213175›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2019

Inferring who-infected-whom-where in the 2016 Zika outbreak in Singapore-a spatio-temporal model.

Kiesha Prem, Max S Y Lau, Clarence C Tam, Marc Z J Ho, Lee-Ching Ng, Alex R Cook

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Using phylogenetics to infer HIV-1 transmission direction between known transmission pairs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kiesha Prem1 Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System , Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549 , Republic of Singapore.
Max S Y Lau2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University , Princeton, NJ 08544 , USA.
Clarence C Tam1 Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System , Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549 , Republic of Singapore.
Marc Z J Ho4 Ministry of Health , 16 College Road, Singapore 169854 , Republic of Singapore.
Lee-Ching Ng5 Environmental Health Institute, National Environment Agency , 11 Biopolis Way, Singapore 138667 , Republic of Singapore.
Alex R Cook1 Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System , Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore 117549 , Republic of Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGMinistry of Health · SGNational Environment Agency · SGPrinceton University · USUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Singapore experienced its first known Zika outbreak in 2016. Given the lack of herd immunity, the suitability of the climate for pathogen transmission, and the year-round presence of the vector- Aedes aegypti-Zika had the potential to become endemic, like dengue. Guillain-Barré syndrome and microcephaly are severe complications associated elsewhere with Zika and the risk of these complications makes understanding its spread imperative. We investigated the spatio-temporal spread of locally transmitted Zika in Singapore and assessed the relevance of non-residential transmission of Zika virus infections, by inferring the possible infection tree (i.e. who-infected-whom-where) and comparing inferences using geographically resolved data on cases' home, their work, or their home and work. We developed a spatio-temporal model using time of onset and both addresses of the Zika-confirmed cases between July and September 2016 to estimate the infection tree using Bayesian data augmentation. Workplaces were involved in a considerable fraction (64.2%) of infections, and homes and workplaces may be distant relative to the scale of transmission, allowing ambulant infected persons may act as the 'vector' infecting distant parts of the country. Contact tracing is a challenge for mosquito-borne diseases, but inferring the geographically structured transmission tree sheds light on the spatial transmission of Zika to immunologically naive regions of the country.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksModels, BiologicalZika VirusFemaleHumansMaleSingaporeZika Virus InfectionBayesian data augmentationspatial modelstemporalvector-borne outbreaksZika

Identifiers

PMID31213175
PMCPMC6597776
OpenAlexW2952375652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.