Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31212759›Full record

ReviewViruses2019

In Vitro Replication of Human Norovirus.

Sutonuka Bhar, Melissa K Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chronic persistent Norovirus in the immune-compromised host.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of an intestinal mucosaJournal of virology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cell Cultures for Virology: Usability, Advantages, and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Inhibitory Effects ofViruses · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sutonuka BharMicrobiology and Cell Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. sutonuka.bhar@ufl.edu.
Melissa K JonesMicrobiology and Cell Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. mmk@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human norovirus (HuNoV) infection is a major cause of gastroenteritis all over the world. Despite this, these non-enveloped RNA viruses are poorly characterized due to the lack of robust and widely available HuNoV culture systems. The two published systems (B cell line and stem cell-derived enteroids) support replication of HuNoVs but the levels of replication are not sufficient for the generation of highly purified virus stocks or the development of culture-based quantification assays. Therefore, improvement of HuNoV in vitro replication is still needed. Murine norovirus and other caliciviruses have provided insights into norovirus replication that paved the way for the development of the current HuNoV culture systems and may also aid in the improvement of these systems. This review will highlight ways in which previous research guided and impacted the development of HuNoV culture systems and discuss ways in which more recent discoveries might be utilized to improve the quality of the HuNoV in vitro replication.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationCell LineHumansNorovirusVirus Cultivationhuman intestinal enteroidshuman norovirusin vitro culture modelsmurine norovirusnorovirus replication

Identifiers

PMID31212759
PMCPMC6630950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.