Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31212734›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Current Trends and Future Perspective of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Exosomes in Corneal Diseases.

Hassan Mansoor, Hon Shing Ong, Andri K Riau, Tisha P Stanzel, Jodhbir S Mehta, Gary Hin-Fai Yam

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Applications of Extracellular Vesicles: Promises and Pitfalls.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hassan MansoorTissue Engineering and Stem Cell group, Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), Singapore 169856, Singapore. hassan-mansoor@hotmail.com.
Hon Shing OngTissue Engineering and Stem Cell group, Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), Singapore 169856, Singapore. honshing@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5475-8712
Andri K RiauTissue Engineering and Stem Cell group, Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), Singapore 169856, Singapore. andri.k.riau@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5105-0484
Tisha P StanzelTissue Engineering and Stem Cell group, Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), Singapore 169856, Singapore. tishap@gmail.com.
Jodhbir S MehtaTissue Engineering and Stem Cell group, Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), Singapore 169856, Singapore. jodmehta@gmail.com.
Gary Hin-Fai YamTissue Engineering and Stem Cell group, Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI), Singapore 169856, Singapore. gary.yam@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8445-3669
Singapore Eye Research Institute · SGSingapore National Eye Center · SGNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

Singapore National Medical Research Council NMRC/TCR/008-SERI/2013SingHealth Foundation SHF/GF585P/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corneal functions (transparency, refractivity and mechanical strength) deteriorate in many corneal diseases but can be restored after corneal transplantation (penetrating and lamellar keratoplasties). However, the global shortage of transplantable donor corneas remains significant and patients are subject to life-long risk of immune response and graft rejection. Various studies have shown the differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into various corneal cell types. With the unique properties of immunomodulation, anti-angiogenesis and anti-inflammation, they offer the advantages in corneal reconstruction. These effects are widely mediated by MSC differentiation and paracrine signaling via exosomes. Besides the cell-free nature of exosomes in circumventing the problems of cell-fate control and tumorigenesis, the vesicle content can be genetically modified for optimal therapeutic affinity. The pharmacology and toxicology, xeno-free processing with sustained delivery, scale-up production in compliant to Good Manufacturing Practice regulations, and cost-effectiveness are the current foci of research. Routes of administration via injection, topical and/or engineered bioscaffolds are also explored for its applicability in treating corneal diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MovementCombined Modality TherapyCorneaCorneal DiseasesCorneal TransplantationExosomesHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHumansImmunomodulationMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNeovascularization, PhysiologicRegenerationangiogenesiscorneal regenerationexosomesimmunomodulationinflammationmesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31212734
PMCPMC6627168
OpenAlexW2949373302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.