ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019
Early Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Children: An Update.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving retention of pediatric feeding tubes with a nasal bridle: a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2025Trial
- Cost Analysis of Individualized Parenteral Nutrition Bags in a Saudi Tertiary-Care Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Implications for Cost-Effective Clinical Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interruptions in nutritional therapy in children with chronic diseases during the acute phase of critical illness and their effect on the administered volume.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- A clinical study on gastric cancer patients administered EN and PN versus PN alone in enhanced recovery after surgery.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Timing of parenteral nutrition initiation in critically ill children: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2023Article
- Nutritional Support for Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- The metabolic effects of multi-trace elements on parenteral nutrition for critically ill pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial and metabolomic research.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
- Impact of Moriamin Forte on Testicular and Epididymal Damage in Rats with Oligoasthenospermia.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Nutritional Management and Outcomes in Malnourished Medical Inpatients in 2020: The Evidence Is Growing!Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In critically ill children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), enteral nutrition (EN) is often delayed due to gastrointestinal dysfunction or interrupted. Since a macronutrient deficit in these patients has been associated with adverse outcomes in observational studies, supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) in PICUs has long been widely advised to meeting nutritional requirements. However, uncertainty of timing of initiation, optimal dose and composition of PN has led to a wide variation in previous guidelines and current clinical practices. The PEPaNIC (Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in the Pediatric ICU) randomized controlled trial recently showed that withholding PN in the first week in PICUs reduced incidence of new infections and accelerated recovery as compared with providing supplemental PN early (within 24 hours after PICU admission), irrespective of diagnosis, severity of illness, risk of malnutrition or age. The early withholding of amino acids in particular, which are powerful suppressors of intracellular quality control by autophagy, statistically explained this outcome benefit. Importantly, two years after PICU admission, not providing supplemental PN early in PICUs did not negatively affect mortality, growth or health status, and significantly improved neurocognitive development. These findings have an important impact on the recently issued guidelines for PN administration to critically ill children. In this review, we summarize the most recent literature that provides evidence on the implications for clinical practice with regard to the use of early supplemental PN in critically ill children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.