Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31212302›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Disconnection of drug-response and placebo-response in acute-phase antipsychotic drug trials on schizophrenia? Meta-regression analysis.

Stefan Leucht, Anna Chaimani, Dimitris Mavridis, Claudia Leucht, Maximilian Huhn, Bartosz Helfer, Myrto Samara, Andrea Cipriani, John R Geddes, John M Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Serotonin type 3 receptor (5-HTNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Placebo-response inflation in supportive oncology symptom trials: mechanisms, methodological challenges, and design implications.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Finding new and better treatments for psychiatric disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Stefan.Leucht@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4934-4352
Anna ChaimaniINSERM, UMR1153 Epidemiology and Statistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité Research Center (CRESS), METHODS Team, Paris Descartes University, Cochrane France, Paris, France.
Dimitris MavridisDepartment of Primary Education, University of Ioannina School of Education, University Campus Ioannina, 45110, Ioannina, Greece.
Claudia LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian HuhnDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Bartosz HelferDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W2 1PG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9863-2871
Myrto SamaraDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5179-8321
John R GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
John M DavisPsychiatric Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago (mc 912), 1601 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
TUM Klinikum · DEOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBDélégation Paris 5 · FRImperial College London · GBInserm · FRUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in efficacy between antipsychotics and placebo in schizophrenia trials have decreased over the past decades. Previous studies have tried to identify potential explanatory factors focusing on response to placebo; however, it is still not clear which factors, if any, specifically moderate drug-response, as they may be different from those moderating placebo-response. Therefore, in this meta-regression analysis we explore whether there is an interaction between drug-response and placebo-response in terms of effect size. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the US Food and Drug Administration website for randomized, placebo-controlled trials investigating the efficacy of antipsychotics in patients with acute schizophrenia (last update: October 2016). The main outcome was the change on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale or the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score from baseline to endpoint after at least 3 weeks of treatment. Multiple patient-, design-, and drug-related potential predictors of response were analyzed by meta-regressions, as predefined in the study protocol. Overall, 167 trials with 28,102 participants were included. Publication year, the number of participants and sites, mean dose, minimum severity threshold as an inclusion criterion, chronicity, industry sponsorship, type of rating scale, diagnostic criteria, and number of medications had a different impact on drug and placebo response. By contrast, baseline severity, duration of wash-out, study duration, and study region affected drug and placebo response in a similar way without a net effect on effect sizes. No other factors had a significant effect on either drug-response or placebo-response. In conclusion, as individual moderators may have different impact on placebo-response and drug-response, it is important to consider also the specific factors influencing drug-response in order to fully understand the difference between antipsychotics and placebo. These results shed further light on the phenomenon of decreasing effect size of antipsychotics for schizophrenia over time and should help design future randomized controlled trials in the field (Prospero registration number CRD42013003342).

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansRegression AnalysisSchizophreniaTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31212302
PMCPMC6785090
OpenAlexW2950831994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.