Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31211856›Full record

ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2020

Identification of a Pan-Gamma-Secretase Inhibitor Response Signature for Notch-Driven Cholangiocarcinoma.

Colm J O'Rourke, Matthias S Matter, Chirag Nepal, Rui Caetano-Oliveira, Phuongnga T Ton, Valentina M Factor, Jesper B Andersen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Notch signalling pathway in development of cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Colm J O'RourkeBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Matthias S MatterInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Chirag NepalBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rui Caetano-OliveiraPathology Department, University Hospital (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal.
Phuongnga T TonMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Valentina M FactorLaboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Jesper B AndersenBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1760-5244
University of Copenhagen · DKNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) mortality rates are increasing as a result of rising incidence and limited curative treatment(s) for patients with advanced disease. NOTCH pathway reactivation has been reported in biliary malignancies to conflicting degrees, hindering prioritization of key therapeutic targets within the network and identification of candidate responder patients for NOTCH-directed therapies. We analyzed genomic data from 341 patients with CCA and identified NOTCH1 significantly increased in a subgroup characterized by distinct stromal infiltration. Network-wide imbalance of the NOTCH pathway was seen in CCA, including correlation of NOTCH1 with NOTCH3 and NOTCH ligands. Given the diversity of observed NOTCH receptor engagement, γ-secretase modulation was rationalized as a therapeutic option. Indeed, subcutaneous transplantation of sensitive and resistant CCA cell lines pretreated with a γ-secretase inhibitor (GSi) cocktail demonstrated the antineoplastic effects of GSi in a subset of CCA and led to the development of a 225-gene responder signature. This signature was validated in an independent cohort of 119 patients. Further, this signature was enriched in liver tumors initiated by hydrodynamic injections of activated-NOTCH as compared with the AKT-RAS-driven tumors. Candidate GSi-responder patients were characterized by distinct transcriptomes overlapping with previous hepatobiliary metastasis and stemness, unique stromal properties, and dysfunctional intratumoral immune infiltration. Pan-cancer analysis identified 41.9% of cancer types to harbor prospective GSi-responder patients, which was adapted into a 20-gene GSi-sensitivity score metric capable of discriminating nanomolar versus micromolar sensitivity to a cell-permeable GSi (Z-LLNle-CHO) across 60 diverse tumor lines (area under the curve = 1). Conclusion: We have established a GSi-responder signature with evidence across several patient cohorts, as well as in vitro and in vivo models, to enable precision medicine application of NOTCH-directed therapy in CCA as well as prospectively across diverse malignancies.

Indexed as

Amyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesBenzazepinesBile Duct NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCholangiocarcinomaDibenzazepinesFluorenesFluorocarbonsHumansKetonesReceptors, NotchTreatment Outcome2,2-dimethyl-N-(6-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5H-dibenzo(b,d)azepin-7-yl)-N'-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl)malonamideAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesBenzazepinesdibenzazepineDibenzazepinesFluorenesFluorocarbonsKetonesReceptors, Notch

Identifiers

PMID31211856
PMCPMC6918012
OpenAlexW2951498062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.