Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31211769›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Birds invest wingbeats to keep a steady head and reap the ultimate benefits of flying together.

Lucy A Taylor, Graham K Taylor, Ben Lambert, James A Walker, Dora Biro, Steven J Portugal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. It pays to follow the leader: Metabolic cost of flight is lower for trailing birds in small groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of wingbeat frequency and amplitude in flight power.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Review
  13. What is physiologging? Introduction to the theme issue, part 2.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucy A TaylorDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-9456
Graham K TaylorDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ben LambertDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4274-4158
James A WalkerDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3062-1567
Dora BiroDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Steven J PortugalSchool of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014427/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flapping flight is the most energetically demanding form of sustained forwards locomotion that vertebrates perform. Flock dynamics therefore have significant implications for energy expenditure. Despite this, no studies have quantified the biomechanical consequences of flying in a cluster flock or pair relative to flying solo. Here, we compared the flight characteristics of homing pigeons (Columba livia) flying solo and in pairs released from a site 7 km from home, using high-precision 5 Hz global positioning system (GPS) and 200 Hz tri-axial accelerometer bio-loggers. As expected, paired individuals benefitted from improved homing route accuracy, which reduced flight distance by 7% and time by 9%. However, realising these navigational gains involved substantial changes in flight kinematics and energetics. Both individuals in a pair increased their wingbeat frequency by 18% by decreasing the duration of their upstroke. This sharp increase in wingbeat frequency caused just a 3% increase in airspeed but reduced the oscillatory displacement of the body by 22%, which we hypothesise relates to an increased requirement for visual stability and manoeuvrability when flying in a flock or pair. The combination of the increase in airspeed and a higher wingbeat frequency would result in a minimum 2.2% increase in the total aerodynamic power requirements if the wingbeats were fully optimised. Overall, the enhanced navigational performance will offset any additional energetic costs as long as the metabolic power requirements are not increased above 9%. Our results demonstrate that the increases in wingbeat frequency when flying together have previously been underestimated by an order of magnitude and force reinterpretation of their mechanistic origin. We show that, for pigeons flying in pairs, two heads are better than one but keeping a steady head necessitates energetically costly kinematics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsColumbidaeEnergy MetabolismFlight, AnimalWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID31211769
PMCPMC6581236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.