ArticlePLoS biology2019
Birds invest wingbeats to keep a steady head and reap the ultimate benefits of flying together.
Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Duration-aware unsupervised segmentation reveals collective movement modes in homing flights of pigeon flocks.Movement ecology · 2026Article
- Multi-Sensor Assessment of Pigeon Flight Behavior: Role of Biomechanical and Landscape Characteristics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changing Flight and Flocking Dynamics of Homing Pigeons (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Behavior and biomechanics: flapping frequency during tandem and solo flights of cliff swallows.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- Hummingbirds use compensatory eye movements to stabilize both rotational and translational visual motion.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- It pays to follow the leader: Metabolic cost of flight is lower for trailing birds in small groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Turbulence causes kinematic and behavioural adjustments in a flapping flier.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Identifying critical kinematic features of animate motion and contribution to animacy perception.iScience · 2023Article
- Grade-control outdoor turning flight of robo-pigeon with quantitative stimulus parameters.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
- Through Hawks' Eyes: Synthetically Reconstructing the Visual Field of a Bird in Flight.International journal of computer vision · 2023Article
- Head-tracking of freely-behaving pigeons in a motion-capture system reveals the selective use of visual field regions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The role of wingbeat frequency and amplitude in flight power.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Review
- What is physiologging? Introduction to the theme issue, part 2.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Rapid evolution of coordinated and collective movement in response to artificial selection.Science advances · 2020Article
- When flocking is costly: reduced cluster-flock density over long-duration flight in pigeons.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2019Article
- Birds invest wingbeats to keep a steady head and reap the ultimate benefits of flying together.PLoS biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flapping flight is the most energetically demanding form of sustained forwards locomotion that vertebrates perform. Flock dynamics therefore have significant implications for energy expenditure. Despite this, no studies have quantified the biomechanical consequences of flying in a cluster flock or pair relative to flying solo. Here, we compared the flight characteristics of homing pigeons (Columba livia) flying solo and in pairs released from a site 7 km from home, using high-precision 5 Hz global positioning system (GPS) and 200 Hz tri-axial accelerometer bio-loggers. As expected, paired individuals benefitted from improved homing route accuracy, which reduced flight distance by 7% and time by 9%. However, realising these navigational gains involved substantial changes in flight kinematics and energetics. Both individuals in a pair increased their wingbeat frequency by 18% by decreasing the duration of their upstroke. This sharp increase in wingbeat frequency caused just a 3% increase in airspeed but reduced the oscillatory displacement of the body by 22%, which we hypothesise relates to an increased requirement for visual stability and manoeuvrability when flying in a flock or pair. The combination of the increase in airspeed and a higher wingbeat frequency would result in a minimum 2.2% increase in the total aerodynamic power requirements if the wingbeats were fully optimised. Overall, the enhanced navigational performance will offset any additional energetic costs as long as the metabolic power requirements are not increased above 9%. Our results demonstrate that the increases in wingbeat frequency when flying together have previously been underestimated by an order of magnitude and force reinterpretation of their mechanistic origin. We show that, for pigeons flying in pairs, two heads are better than one but keeping a steady head necessitates energetically costly kinematics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.