Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31211357›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2020

Altered Sensitivity to Motion of Area MT Neurons Following Long-Term V1 Lesions.

Maureen A Hagan, Tristan A Chaplin, Krystel R Huxlin, Marcello G P Rosa, Leo L Lui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. From error to evidence: blindsight in the making†.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Exogenous Spatial Attention Helps Overcome Spatial Specificity of Visual Learning in the Blind Field After V1 Damage.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Remodeling of lateral geniculate nucleus projections to extrastriate area MT following long-term lesions of striate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maureen A HaganDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Tristan A ChaplinDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Krystel R HuxlinFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Marcello G P RosaDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Leo L LuiDepartment of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.

Funding

Vision recovery in cortical blindnessR01EY027314 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MARISA CARRASCO, Krystel R Huxlin · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
Mechanisms of visual learning in cortical blindnessR01EY021209 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HUXLIN, KRYSTEL R · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021209NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates with primary visual cortex (V1) damage often retain residual motion sensitivity, which is hypothesized to be mediated by middle temporal area (MT). MT neurons continue to respond to stimuli shortly after V1 lesions; however, experimental and clinical studies of lesion-induced plasticity have shown that lesion effects can take several months to stabilize. It is unknown what physiological changes occur in MT and whether neural responses persist long after V1 damage. We recorded neuronal responses in MT to moving dot patterns in adult marmoset monkeys 6-12 months after unilateral V1 lesions. In contrast to results obtained shortly after V1 lesions, we found that fewer MT neurons were direction selective, including neurons expected to still receive projections from remaining parts of V1. The firing rates of most cells increased with increases in motion strength, regardless of stimulus direction. Furthermore, firing rates were higher and more variable than in control MT cells. To test whether these observations could be mechanistically explained by underlying changes in neural circuitry, we created a network model of MT. We found that a local imbalance of inhibition and excitation explained the observed firing rate changes. These results provide the first insights into functional implications of long-term plasticity in MT following V1 lesions.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAnimalsCallithrixFemaleMaleModels, NeurologicalMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationTemporal LobeVisual Cortexblindsightmarmoset monkeymotionMTplasticityvision

Identifiers

PMID31211357
PMCPMC7444738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.