Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31211354›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2019

Maintenance Pharmacological Treatment of Juvenile Bipolar Disorder: Review and Meta-Analyses.

Caitlin S Yee, Emily R Hawken, Ross J Baldessarini, Gustavo H Vázquez

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Trazodone Prescribing for Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder on Medicaid in Oregon.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022
    Article
  9. Metabolic effects of adding Topiramate on Aripiprazole in bipolar patients aged between 6-18 years, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caitlin S YeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Emily R HawkenDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Research, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Ross J BaldessariniInternational Consortium for Bipolar & Psychotic Disorders Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massashusetts.
Gustavo H VázquezDepartment of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
McLean Hospital · USQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines for maintenance treatment of juvenile bipolar disorder rely heavily on evidence from adult studies and relatively brief trials in juveniles, leaving uncertainties about optimal long-term treatment. We aimed to systematically review long-term treatment trials for juvenile bipolar disorder.

methodsWe analyzed data recovered by a systematic literature search using the PRISMA guidelines statement, through 2018, for peer-reviewed reports on pharmacological treatments for juvenile bipolar disorder lasting ≥24 weeks.

resultsOf 13 reports with 16 trials of 9 treatments (18.8% were randomized and controlled), with 1773 subjects (94.4% BD-I; ages 6.9-15.1 years), lasting 11.7 (6-22) months. Pooled clinical response rates were 66.8% (CI: 64.4-69.1) with drugs vs 60.6% (53.0-66.7) in 3 placebo-control arms. Random-effects meta-analysis of 4 controlled trials yielded pooled odds ratio (OR) = 2.88 ([0.87-9.60], P = .08) for clinical response, and OR = 7.14 ([1.12-45.6], P = .04) for nonrecurrence. Apparent efficacy ranked: combined agents >anticonvulsants ≥lithium ≥antipsychotics. Factors favoring response ranked: more attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, polytherapy, randomized controlled trial design, nonrecurrence vs response. Adverse events (incidence, 5.50%-28.5%) notably included cognitive dulling, weight-gain, and gastrointestinal symptoms; early dropout rates averaged 49.8%.

conclusionsPharmacological treatments, including anticonvulsants, lithium, and second-generation antipsychotics, may reduce long-term morbidity in juvenile bipolar disorder. However, study number, quality, and effect magnitude were limited, leaving the status of scientific support for maintenance treatment for juvenile bipolar disorder inconclusive.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge of OnsetAnticonvulsantsAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderChildChild BehaviorClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMaleRisk FactorsTime FactorsAnticonvulsantsAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic Agentsbipolar disorderefficacyjuvenilelong-termpharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31211354
PMCPMC6672626
OpenAlexW2955098978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.