Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31211178›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2019

No apparent effect of naproxen on CSF markers of innate immune activation.

Pierre-François Meyer, Anne Labonté, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Judes Poirier, John C S Breitner, PREVENT‐AD Research Group

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pierre-François MeyerFaculty of Medicine McGill University Montréal Québec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-0997
Anne LabontéCenter for Studies on the Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease (StoP-AD) Douglas Mental Health University Institute Montréal Québec Canada.
Pedro Rosa-NetoFaculty of Medicine McGill University Montréal Québec Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-1376
Judes PoirierFaculty of Medicine McGill University Montréal Québec Canada.
John C S BreitnerFaculty of Medicine McGill University Montréal Québec Canada.
PREVENT‐AD Research Group
Douglas Mental Health University Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied 78 participants having a parental or multiple-sibling history of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a two-year randomized placebo-controlled trial of naproxen 220 mg b.i.d. for mitigation of early AD pathogenesis. Naproxen was detected in cerebrospinal fluid at concentrations ~100 times lower than in plasma, but produced negligible change in immune markers. The repeated lack of benefit in AD prevention trials using naproxen and related drugs may reflect limited CNS permeability, lack of expected drug effects, or both. These findings suggest reconsideration of implications from results of AD prevention trials using anti-inflammatory drugs.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiomarkersCelecoxibCytokinesFemaleHumansInterferon alpha-2Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinMaleMiddle AgedNaproxenAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBiomarkersCelecoxibCytokinesIL1RN protein, humanInterferon alpha-2Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinNaproxen

Identifiers

PMID31211178
PMCPMC6562029
OpenAlexW3021360879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.