Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31211020›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

A "modified Obel" method for the severity scoring of (endocrinopathic) equine laminitis.

Alexandra Meier, Melody de Laat, Christopher Pollitt, Donald Walsh, James McGree, Dania B Reiche, Marcella von Salis-Soglio, Luke Wells-Smith, Ulrich Mengeler, Daniel Mesa Salas and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra MeierEarth, Environmental and Biological Sciences School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Melody de LaatEarth, Environmental and Biological Sciences School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Christopher PollittAustralian Equine Laminitis Research Unit, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Donald WalshAnimal Health Foundation, Pacific, MO, USA.
James McGreeSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Dania B ReicheBoehringer-Ingelheim Vetmedica, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Marcella von Salis-SoglioBoehringer-Ingelheim Vetmedica, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Luke Wells-SmithMotion Equine Podiatry Consulting, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Ulrich MengelerVeterinary Practice for Horses, Hamminkeln, Germany.
Daniel Mesa SalasVeterinary Practice Datteln, Datteln, Germany.
Susanne DroegemuellerPractice for Horses and Pets, Gehrden, Germany.
Martin N SillenceEarth, Environmental and Biological Sciences School, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2837-5456
Queensland University of Technology · AUBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEThe University of Queensland · AUVestische Caritas-Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaminitis is a common equine disease characterized by foot pain, and is commonly diagnosed using a five-grade Obel system developed in 1948 using sepsis-related cases. However, endocrinopathic laminitis is now the most common form of the disease and clinical signs may be mild, or spread across two Obel grades. This paper describes a modified method which assigns scores to discreet clinical signs, providing a wider scale suitable for use in a research setting.

methodsThe "modified Obel" method was developed using an iterative process. First, a prototype method was developed during the detailed observation of 37 ponies undergoing a laminitis induction experiment. The final method was refined and validated using video footage taken during the induction study and from a clinical trial of naturally occurring endocrinopathic laminitis cases. The Obel method was deconstructed and key laminitis signs were evaluated to develop a three-stage, five criteria method that employs a severity scale of 0-12. Veterinarians (

resultsThe "modified Obel" and Obel methods showed excellent and similar inter-observer agreement based on the Kendall

conclusionBoth methods show excellent agreement, reproducibility and repeatability when used to diagnose endocrinopathic laminitis. The "modified Obel" method is a three-step examination process for severity-scoring of endocrinopathic laminitis, initially proposed for use within a research setting. When using the modified method a diagnosis of laminitis also requires clinical acumen. The allocation of scores for specific clinical signs should be particularly useful in research trials monitoring laminitis recovery.

Indexed as

DiagnosticsEquine metabolic syndromeHorsesInsulinLamenessLaminitis

Identifiers

PMID31211020
PMCPMC6557244
OpenAlexW2948436908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.