Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31211003›Full record

ReviewTranslational vision science & technology2019

Efficacy of Different Procedures of Intra-Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Keratoconus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cédric Benoist d'Azy, Bruno Pereira, Frédéric Chiambaretta, Frédéric Dutheil

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of a Short Daytime Nap on the Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. CAIRS and nomograms: a narrative review.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Asymmetric Thickness Intracorneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cédric Benoist d'AzyUniversity Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Ophthalmology, Preventive and Occupational Medicine, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraUniversity Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (CHU), Biostatistics Unit, Clinical Research and Innovation Direction, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frédéric ChiambarettaUniversity Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Ophthalmology, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frédéric DutheilClermont Auvergne University, CNRS, LaPSCo, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Preventive and Occupational Medicine, WittyFit, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of the functional, keratometric, and refractive postoperative parameters of intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus and its association with collagen cross-linking (CXL), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on case series published between 2007 and 2017. Results: We included 95 case series with a total of 4560 patients. We included 64 studies of the ICRS procedure, 20 studies of ICRS+CXL, 9 studies of ICRS+CXL+PRK, and 5 studies of ICRS+IOL. We demonstrated an overall improvement of all parameters in all procedures. Cylinder was decreased with an overall effect size (ES) of -1.15 (-1.36 to -0.95; I Conclusions: Although the quality and strength of the data are questionable, ICRS implantation is an effective strategy to preserve visual function in keratoconic patients. Particularly, ICRS+CXL+PRK could be a low invasive procedure to propose to young keratoconic patients. Translational Relevance: To propose an overview of postoperative parameters on each ICRS procedure on keratoconus.

Indexed as

collagen cross likingintracorneal ringintraocular lenskeratoconusrefractive photokeratectomy

Identifiers

PMID31211003
PMCPMC6561134
OpenAlexW2949075157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.