ReviewEFORT open reviews2019
MoM total hip replacements in Europe: a NORE report.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04444570 (Continuous Glycemia Monitoring in Perioperative Period in Patients Undergoing Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Continuous Glycemia Monitoring in Perioperative Period in Patients Undergoing Total Knee or Hip Arthroplasty: a Protocol of Observational Study
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality and Utility of European Cardiovascular and Orthopaedic Registries for the Regulatory Evaluation of Medical Device Safety and Performance Across the Implant Lifecycle: A Systematic Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Pooled it
- Frequency of safety signals from scientific reports, manufactures, registers, and other sources for a random selection of hip and knee prostheses.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Metal ion levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: A single-center longitudinal study of Chinese patients.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2024Article
- May the 4th be with you: mixed-methods best-evidence synthesis on 4th-generation alumina-zirconia ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Study of a Novel Explosively Hardened Pure Titanium Alloy for Medical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Strategies for fixation of periprosthetic fragility fractures of the neck of femur below a well-functioning hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A case-series.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2023Article
- Periarticular metal hypersensitivity complications of hip bearings containing cobalt-chromium.EFORT open reviews · 2022Article
- Correlation Between Co Levels in Hair and Blood of Patients Who Underwent Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2022Article
- Observational
- Comparison of the long-term cause of failure and survivorship of four hundred and twenty seven metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: resurfacing versus large head total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
- The rise of registry-based research: a bibliometric analysis.Acta orthopaedica · 2021Review
- Metal Ion Release, Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty at Long-Term Follow-Up.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A prospective study on cancer risk after total hip replacements for 41,402 patients linked to the Cancer registry of Norway.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- Revision of a Monoblock Metal-on-Metal Cup Using a Dual Mobility Component: Is It a Reasonable Option?Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Changing Device Regulations in the European Union: Impact on Research, Innovation and Clinical Practice.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 12 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to determine the prevalence of metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacement (THR) in European registries, to assess the incidence of revision surgery and to describe the national follow-up guidelines for patients with MoM THR including resurfacings.Eleven registries of the Network of Orthopaedic Registries of Europe (NORE) participated totalling 54 434 resurfacings and 58 498 large stemmed MoM THRs.The resurfacings and stemmed large head MoM had higher pooled revision rates at five years than the standard total hip arthroplasties (THA): 6.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3 to 6.8 for resurfacings; 6.9%, 95% CI 4.4 to 9.4 for stemmed large head MoM; and 3.0%, 95% CI 2.5 to 3.6 for conventional THA.The resurfacings and stemmed large head MoM had higher pooled revision rates at ten years than the standard THAs: 12.1%, 95% CI 11.0 to 13.3 for resurfacings; 15.5%, 95% CI 9.0 to 22 for stemmed large head MoM; and 5.1%, 95% CI 3.8 to 6.4 for conventional THA.Although every national registry reports slightly different protocols for follow-up, these mostly consist of annual assessments of cobalt and chromium levels in blood and MRI (MARS) imaging. Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.